Nebraska Central Railroad Co. v. FRA, et al
| Nebraska Central Railroad Company |
| Federal Railroad Administration, Amit Bose, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Railroad Administration and United States Department of Transportation |
| 24-1774 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Dennis Lane for Petitioner Nebraska Central Railroad Company w/service 04/16/2024 [5383708] [24-1774] (DL) [Entered: 04/16/2024 08:34 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by David Rifkind for Petitioner Nebraska Central Railroad Company w/service 04/16/2024 [5383878] [24-1774] (DFR) [Entered: 04/16/2024 11:58 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Elizabeth Betsy C. Smith for Petitioner Nebraska Central Railroad Company w/service 04/16/2024 [5383704] [24-1774] (ECS) [Entered: 04/16/2024 08:30 AM] |
| CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 05/20/2024. Appendix due on 06/03/2024. Brief of Union Pacific Railroad Co. and Nebraska Central Railroad Company due on 06/03/2024. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief. [5383161] [24-1736, 24-1774] (CMH) [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:47 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of a final rule of the Federal Railroad Administration (Electronic) filed by Petitioner Nebraska Central Railroad Company, w/service 04/12/2024. [5383152] [24-1774] (CMH) [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:35 PM] |
| Agency case docketed. [5383144] [24-1774] (CMH) [Entered: 04/12/2024 03:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
