In Re: Bruce Echols
In re: Bruce Allen Echols |
24-1787 |
April 16, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5385180] [24-1787] (BNW) [Entered: 04/19/2024 10:03 AM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - The petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Bruce Allen Echols is denied [ # 5383947-2 ]. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. JAMES B. LOKEN, BOBBY E. SHEPHERD and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Apr 2024 [5385170] [24-1787] (BNW) [Entered: 04/19/2024 09:53 AM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Bobby E. Shepherd, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5385168] [24-1787] (BNW) [Entered: 04/19/2024 09:51 AM] |
PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Bruce Allen Echols w/service 04/16/2024 [5383947] [24-1787] (AEV) [Entered: 04/16/2024 02:00 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5383946] [24-1787] (AEV) [Entered: 04/16/2024 01:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In Re: Bruce Echols | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: Bruce Allen Echols | |
Represented By: | Bruce Allen Echols |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.