Lillian Vogt v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Lillian Louis Morgan Vogt |
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
24-1808 |
April 18, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. - FOR CAL [5385327] [24-1808] (BCS) [Entered: 04/19/2024 01:10 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Kevin M. Carnie, Jr. for Appellant Lillian Louis Morgan Vogt w/service 04/19/2024 [5385352] [24-1808] (KMC) [Entered: 04/19/2024 01:48 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Patrick R. McPhail for Appellant Lillian Louis Morgan Vogt w/service 04/19/2024 [5385367] [24-1808] (PRM) [Entered: 04/19/2024 02:02 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Benjamin C. Sasse' for Appellee Progressive Casualty Insurance Company w/service 04/19/2024 [5385209] [24-1808] (BCS) [Entered: 04/19/2024 10:35 AM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 05/28/2024. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Lillian Louis Morgan Vogt due 05/28/2024. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5384831] [24-1808] (AEV) [Entered: 04/18/2024 11:59 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [5384823] [24-1808] (AEV) [Entered: 04/18/2024 11:53 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Memorandum and Order 3/14/24. [5384830] [24-1808] (AEV) [Entered: 04/18/2024 11:58 AM] |
Case Docketed On Transfer - 23(f) - The case was transferred from miscellaneous case number 24-8003. [5384755] [24-1808] (AEV) [Entered: 04/18/2024 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.