United States v. Phillip Rogers
| United States of America |
| Phillip Lanell Rogers |
| 24-1904 |
| April 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Judgment 9/7/23, Motion for 821 Amendment 2/20/24, Order 2/26/24, Motion to Reconsider 4/9/24, Docket Text Order 4/10/24, docket entries, [5388652] [24-1904] (AEV) [Entered: 04/30/2024 11:05 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5388649] [24-1904] (AEV) [Entered: 04/30/2024 11:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Phillip Rogers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Dan Chatham |
| Represented By: | Kraig Ryan Hamit |
| Represented By: | Martin Joseph McLaughlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Phillip Lanell Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Phillip Lanell Rogers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
