In re: Tiran Casteel
In re: Tiran Rodez Casteel, also known as Tiran R. Casteel |
24-2189 |
June 7, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5403587] [24-2189] (BNW) [Entered: 06/13/2024 03:03 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - The petition for permission to file a Rule 60(b) motion is denied. The petition is also denied to the extent it seeks an extraordinary writ [ # 5402698-2 ]. DENIED. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and DAVID R. STRAS Adp June 2024 [5403574] [24-2189] (BNW) [Entered: 06/13/2024 02:56 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, David R. Stras in St. Louis [5403545] [24-2189] (BNW) [Entered: 06/13/2024 02:21 PM] |
PETITION for Extraordinary Writ (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Tiran Rodez Casteel w/service 06/11/2024 [5402698] [24-2189] (CAH) [Entered: 06/11/2024 03:02 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5402694] [24-2189] (CAH) [Entered: 06/11/2024 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Tiran Casteel | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: Tiran Rodez Casteel, also known as Tiran R. Casteel | |
Represented By: | Tiran Rodez Casteel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.