Mary Holmes, et al v. Robert Knodell
| Mary Holmes, Empower Missouri, Denise Davis and Andrew Dallas |
| Robert J. Knodell, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Missouri Department of Social Services |
| 24-2192 |
| June 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5422789] [24-2192] (BNW) [Entered: 08/09/2024 11:01 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Appellees [ # 5406592-2 ] motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, JANE KELLY and DAVID R. STRAS Adp July 2024 [5415344] [24-2192] (HAG) [Entered: 07/19/2024 02:01 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance pending ruling on the motion to dismiss. [5406822] [24-2192] (JMB) [Entered: 06/25/2024 10:46 AM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Jaclyn Niccole Warr for Appellees Andrew Dallas, Denise Davis, Empower Missouri and Mary Holmes w/service 06/24/2024. [5406592] [24-2192] (JNW) [Entered: 06/24/2024 05:12 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5402905] [24-2192] (RDB) [Entered: 06/12/2024 09:49 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 5/9/2024 [5402907] [24-2192] (RDB) [Entered: 06/12/2024 09:53 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 07/22/2024. Appendix due 08/01/2024. BRIEF APPELLANT, Robert J. Knodell due 08/01/2024 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5402910] [24-2192] (RDB) [Entered: 06/12/2024 09:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
