Krishonn Cooney v. Chad Wilson, et al
| Krishonn Cooney |
| Chad Wilson, Narcotics Investigator, Conway Police Department, Matthew Tucker, Sgt., Conway Police Department and Kelton Smith, Officer, Conway Police Department |
| 24-2312 |
| June 25, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Party Krishonn Cooney w/service by USCA8 08/23/2024. [5427508] [24-2312] (DNS) [Entered: 08/23/2024 08:50 AM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Krishonn Cooney w/service by USCA8 08/23/2024 [5427512] [24-2312] (DNS) [Entered: 08/23/2024 08:51 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Krishonn Cooney is denied [ # 5413097-2 ]. This appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or demonstrate eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). DISMISSED. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, JANE KELLY and DAVID R. STRAS Adp July 2024 [5420505] [24-2312] (BNW) [Entered: 08/02/2024 03:30 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Lavenski R. Smith, Jane Kelly, David R. Stras in St. Louis [5420504] [24-2312] (BNW) [Entered: 08/02/2024 03:28 PM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Krishonn Cooney inquiring as to the status of the case. w/service 07/19/2024 [5415402] [24-2312] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2024 02:37 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding appellant's letter inquiring as to status of the case (docket sheet mailed). [5415404] [24-2312] (AEV) [Entered: 07/19/2024 02:38 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - pro ce certificate of service of motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis filed by Krishonn Cooney. [5413885] [24-2312] (CMH) [Entered: 07/16/2024 11:16 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Krishonn Cooney w/service 07/12/2024. [5413097] [24-2312] (CMH) [Entered: 07/12/2024 03:27 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5407095] [24-2312] (CMH) [Entered: 06/25/2024 02:14 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 6/5/2024, Judgment 6/5/2024 and Order 6/25/2024. [5407099] [24-2312] (CMH) [Entered: 06/25/2024 02:19 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 07/25/2024 [5407103] [24-2312] (CMH) [Entered: 06/25/2024 02:21 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5407107] [24-2312] (CMH) [Entered: 06/25/2024 02:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
