CessanadaKha Israel v. Duane Fenner, et al
| CessanadaKha Jahish Israel, also known as Jason E. Fenner |
| Maiden, Lt., E.A.R.U., ADC, Brown, Lt., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Patrick Shane Fenner, Younger Brother, Thomas Fenner, Cousin, Pointdexter, Cpl., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Ratcliff, Cpl., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Taggett, Lt., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Duane Edward Fenner, Father, Williams, Lt., E.A.R.U., ADC, Paul Garner, Personal Adjustment Center, Jonesboro, Matthew, Sgt., Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Norton, Sgt., E.A.R.U., ADC, Dan Brown, Supervisor, Abilities Unlimited, Jonesboro, Randell Manis, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Candice Jones, Counselor, Community Youth Service and Mid-South Health Services, Lawrence Fenner, Uncle, Williams, Judge, Fayetteville Juvenile Court, Holmes, Corporal (Oct. 2019), East Arkansas Regional Unit, Lawerence Fenner, Cousin, Kelly, Major, Little Tucker, ADC, Duane John Howard Fenner, "D.J.", Middle Brother, Engstroum, Dr., Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Harris, Captain, E.A.R.U., ADC, Jackson, Captain, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and Does, 1-55 and 56-127 |
| 24-2413 |
| July 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT FILED - Entitled "Disposition of Order" filed by CessanadaKha Jahish Israel. w/service 08/30/2024 [5430702] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 08/30/2024 12:05 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of CessanadaKha Jahish Israel due 08/26/2024 [5423209] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 08/12/2024 09:36 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED confirming that appellant filed a notice of appeal, along with a copy of a notice of appeal and district court filing, filed by CessanadaKha Jahish Israel. w/service 07/19/2024 [5415507] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 07/19/2024 04:13 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5411677] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 07/09/2024 02:25 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 4/12/24, judgment 4/12/24, order 7/9/24. [5411684] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 07/09/2024 02:30 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The District Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 08/08/2024 [5411686] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 07/09/2024 02:31 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5411689] [24-2413] (CAH) [Entered: 07/09/2024 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.