United States v. Charleton Maxwell
| United States of America |
| Charleton Everett Maxwell |
| 24-2511 |
| July 24, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5416713] [24-2511] (CMH) [Entered: 07/24/2024 12:43 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment 2/14/2022, Motion for Sentence Reduction 1/31/024, Order 2/21/2024, Motion for Reconsideration 6/24/2024, and Order 6/26/2024. [5416715] [24-2511] (CMH) [Entered: 07/24/2024 12:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Charleton Maxwell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | John H. Lammers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charleton Everett Maxwell | |
| Represented By: | Charleton Everett Maxwell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
