James Lucas v. Dadson Manufacturing Corp., et al
| James R. Lucas |
| Dadson Manufacturing Corp., Thomas H. Reppell and Peter B. Lucas, Dadson Officer |
| 24-2696 |
| August 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGE ORDER: The petition for rehearing is denied as overlength [ # 5438689-2 ]. The request for a new 3-judge panel is denied. Adp Sep 2024 [5447346] [24-2696] (BNW) [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:47 PM] |
| LETTER from Appellant James R. Lucas regarding the petition for rehearing being received w/service 09/20/2024. [5438319] [24-2696] (BNW) [Entered: 09/20/2024 02:48 PM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant James R. Lucas, w/service by USCA8 09/23/2024. [5438689] [24-2696] (HAG) [Entered: 09/23/2024 10:17 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The district court's order is summarily affirmed. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant James R. Lucas is denied as moot [ # 5431446-2 ]. JAMES B. LOKEN, RALPH R. ERICKSON and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Sep 2024 [5432236] [24-2696] (BNW) [Entered: 09/05/2024 08:50 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Ralph R. Erickson, David R. Stras in St. Louis [5432225] [24-2696] (BNW) [Entered: 09/05/2024 08:44 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant James R. Lucas w/service 09/03/2024. [5431446] [24-2696] (RDB) [Entered: 09/03/2024 02:46 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5427241] [24-2696] (RDB) [Entered: 08/22/2024 01:38 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 8/1/2024, Order dated 8/12/2024 [5427244] [24-2696] (RDB) [Entered: 08/22/2024 01:42 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/19/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5427246] [24-2696] (RDB) [Entered: 08/22/2024 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
