Thomas Davis, III v. United States
| Thomas Alexander Davis, III |
| United States of America |
| 24-2992 |
| September 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5441573] [24-2992] (AEV) [Entered: 10/01/2024 10:33 AM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL). Response of United States of America due 10/15/2024, filed by Petitioner Thomas Alexander Davis, III w/service 10/01/2024. [5441586] [24-2992] (AEV) [Entered: 10/01/2024 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Davis, III v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Richard D. Westphal |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Thomas Alexander Davis, III | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Alexander Davis III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
