Steven Wood v. Dexter Payne
| Steven Ray Wood |
| Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction |
| 24-3051 |
| October 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Steven Ray Wood, w/service by USCA8 11/19/2024. [5458332] [24-3051] (HAG) [Entered: 11/19/2024 03:01 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. Appellant's [ # 5451406-2 ] motion to dismiss illegal enhancements is denied as moot. JAMES B. LOKEN, JANE KELLY and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Nov 2024 [5453567] [24-3051] (HAG) [Entered: 11/05/2024 12:28 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Jane Kelly, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5453564] [24-3051] (HAG) [Entered: 11/05/2024 12:26 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Denying as moot [ # 5451404-2 ] motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant, as pauper staus was previously granted. The motion to dismiss illegal enhancements of 100% filed by Appellant , [ # 5451406-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5451412] [24-3051] (CMH) [Entered: 10/29/2024 04:06 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss illegal enhancements of 100% with memo in support, filed by Appellant Steven Ray Wood. [5451406] [24-3051] (CMH) [Entered: 10/29/2024 04:01 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Steven Ray Wood. [5451404] [24-3051] (CMH) [Entered: 10/29/2024 03:58 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings & Recommendations 09/11/2024, Order 09/30/2024, and Judgment 09/30/2024. [5444272] [24-3051]--[Edited 10/08/2024 by CMH] (CMH) [Entered: 10/08/2024 03:25 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5444274] [24-3051] (CMH) [Entered: 10/08/2024 03:27 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5444268] [24-3051] (CMH) [Entered: 10/08/2024 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Steven Wood v. Dexter Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Ray Wood | |
| Represented By: | Steven Ray Wood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
