Frederick Barton v. James Hill, et al
| Frederick Jody Barton |
| James Hill, Sergeant, P.C.R.D.F. (Originally named Hill), Virmesa Jackson, Deputy, P.C.R.D.F. (Originally named Jackson), Matthew Cobb, Sergeant, P.C.R.D.F. (Originally named Cobb), Charles Allen, Lieutenant, P.C.R.D.F. (Originally named Allen) and Nikkhol Harris, Deputy, P.C.R.D.F (Originally named as Does) (Previously named J Harris) |
| 24-3065 |
| October 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's brief was due on November 19, 2024, but has not been filed. It is hereby ordered that appellant show cause, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5461779] [24-3065] (DNS) [Entered: 12/02/2024 03:31 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's motions to dismiss defendants; for production of documents; and to compel documents filed by Appellant Frederick Jody Barton in 24-3065 [ # 5454786-2 ], [ # 5454784-2 ], [ # 5454780-2 ], are hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5454799] [24-3065] (DNS) [Entered: 11/08/2024 10:00 AM] |
| MOTION for production of documents, filed by Appellant Frederick Jody Barton w/service by USCA8 11/08/2024. [5454784] [24-3065] - FOR CAL (DNS) [Entered: 11/08/2024 09:51 AM] |
| MOTION to dismiss defendants, filed by Appellant Frederick Jody Bartonw/service by USCA8 11/08/2024. [5454780] [24-3065] - FOR CAL --[Edited 11/08/2024 by DNS] to indicate filer (DNS) [Entered: 11/08/2024 09:48 AM] |
| MOTION to compel documents, filed by Appellant Frederick Jody Barton w/service by USCA8 11/08/2024. [5454786] [24-3065] - FOR CAL, (DNS) [Entered: 11/08/2024 09:53 AM] |
| ***LOCKED DOCUMENT*** APPEARANCE filed by Melissa K. Dugger for Appellees Charles Allen, Matthew Cobb, Nikkhol Harris, James Hill and Virmesa Jackson w/service 10/11/2024 [5445482] [24-3065] --[Edited 10/11/2024 by DNS] Counsel directed to refile appearance with corrected identified parties. Refer to docket ID no. 5445590 (MKD) [Entered: 10/11/2024 11:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Melissa K. Dugger for Appellees Charles Allen, Matthew Cobb, Nikkhol Harris, James Hill and Virmesa Jackson w/service 10/11/2024 [5445590] [24-3065] (MKD) [Entered: 10/11/2024 02:16 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5445038] [24-3065] (CMH) [Entered: 10/10/2024 11:35 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Recommended Disposition 08/13/2024, Order 09/03/2024, Order 09/04/2024, Judgment 09/042024, Order 10/08/2024, and Order 10/09/2024. [5445045] [24-3065] (CMH) [Entered: 10/10/2024 11:44 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Frederick Jody Barton due 11/19/2024. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5445050] [24-3065] (CMH) [Entered: 10/10/2024 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
