Steven Scruggs v. Matthew Fitzhugh, et al
Plaintiff: Steven Parker Scruggs
Defendant: Matthew Dillon Fitzhugh, In His Individual and Official Capacity, City of Cabot, a Municipality and Scott Steely, In His Official Capacity
Case Number: 24-3184
Filed: October 28, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2024 CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Steven Parker Scruggs due 12/11/2024 [5461091] [24-3184] (RDB) [Entered: 11/27/2024 10:55 AM]
November 5, 2024 APPEARANCE filed by Sara Monaghan for Appellees City of Cabot, Matthew Dillon Fitzhugh and Scott Steely w/service 11/05/2024 [5453438] [24-3184] (SLM) [Entered: 11/05/2024 10:05 AM]
October 29, 2024 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED***APPEARANCE filed by Sara Monaghan for Appellees City of Cabot, Matthew Dillon Fitzhugh and Scott Steely w/service 10/29/2024 [5451014] [24-3184]--[Edited 11/05/2024 by CRJ. Counsel has refiled the app form with appellant's address. See history #5453438] (SLM) [Entered: 10/29/2024 08:52 AM]
October 28, 2024 Civil case docketed. [5450924] [24-3184] (RDB) [Entered: 10/28/2024 04:50 PM]
October 28, 2024 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 9/27/2024, Judgment dated 9/27/2024 [5450927] [24-3184] (RDB) [Entered: 10/28/2024 04:54 PM]
October 28, 2024 CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 11/18/2024, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5450928] [24-3184] (RDB) [Entered: 10/28/2024 04:54 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Steven Scruggs v. Matthew Fitzhugh, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Dillon Fitzhugh, In His Individual and Official Capacity
Represented By: Sara Lynn Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Cabot, a Municipality
Represented By: Sara Lynn Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Steely, In His Official Capacity
Represented By: Sara Lynn Monaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Parker Scruggs
Represented By: Steven Parker Scruggs
Represented By: Lucas Rowan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?