Floyd Hawkins v. Betrina Randall, et al
| Floyd Richard Hawkins |
| Aaron Gitthens, Karen Rhodes, Medical Staff, M.D., Amy Gordee, Director of Nursing, Andrea Melton, Ms. Seely, Nurse Acting Grievance Officer, Jaimee Norton, Nurse Practitioner, Brenda West, Jenny Meehan, Nurse, Acting Director of Nursing, Rayma Anderson, Betrina Randall, Philip Tippen, Teresa Kim Hopkins, Nurse and Jessica Moore |
| 24-3257 |
| November 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's motion for injunction [ # 5467199-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. [5467203] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/17/2024 10:14 AM] |
| MOTION for injunction, filed by Appellant Floyd Richard Hawkins, w/service 12/17/2024. [5467199] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/17/2024 10:11 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's second motion for appointment of counsel [ # 5465765-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. [5465789] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/12/2024 12:13 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The show cause order of 12/10/2024 is hereby dissolved. [5465780] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/12/2024 12:00 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Floyd Richard Hawkins, w/service 12/12/2024. [5465769] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/12/2024 11:55 AM] |
| Second MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Floyd Richard Hawkins, w/service 12/12/2024. [5465765] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/12/2024 11:51 AM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Law in Support of Appeal filed by Appellant Floyd Richard Hawkins regarding originating court document notice of appeal, Doc No. [ # 5453906-2 ], w/service 12/12/2024. [5465756] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/12/2024 11:48 AM] |
| RESPONSE to clerk order pay docketing fee [ # 5453909-2 ] and clerk order Declaration Requested [ # 5453912-2 ], filed by Party Floyd Richard Hawkins, w/service 12/12/2024. [5465751] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/12/2024 11:44 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5464855] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/10/2024 02:04 PM] |
| RESPONSE to clerk order pay docketing fee [ # 5453909-2 ] and clerk order Declaration Requested [ # 5453912-2 ], filed by Party Floyd Richard Hawkins, w/service 12/03/2024. Courtesy copy of docket sheet forwarded to Appellant this date. [5462192] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 12/03/2024 11:45 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Floyd Richard Hawkins, [ # 5460487-2 ], is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. [5460489] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/26/2024 08:14 AM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Floyd Richard Hawkins, w/service 11/26/2024. [5460487] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/26/2024 08:13 AM] |
| MEMORANDUM in support of originating court document notice of appeal, Doc No. [ # 5453906-2 ], filed by Appellant Floyd Richard Hawkins w/service 11/26/2024. [5460486] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/26/2024 08:10 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Response to Clerk Order Regarding Declaration, received in the District Court on 11/15/2024 and forwarded 11/19/2024, filed by Floyd Richard Hawkins w/service 11/26/2024. [5460483] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/26/2024 08:06 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 09/19/2024, Judgment 09/19/2024, and Order 11/05/2024. [5453906] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/06/2024 11:38 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5453914] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/06/2024 11:47 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant is directed to provide the court with a declaration under penalties of perjury or a notarized statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(c)(1)(A) stating the date in which the notice of appeal was deposited in the institutions internal mail system. Response of Floyd Richard Hawkins due 11/20/2024. [5453912] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/06/2024 11:45 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 12/04/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5453909] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/06/2024 11:40 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5453888] [24-3257] (CJO) [Entered: 11/06/2024 11:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.