Roderick Roberson, et al v. Kansas City Southern
| Chris Ulrich, Justin Berberich, Michael Hudson, Ron Collins, Caleb Schmitt, Roderick Roberson and Dylon White |
| The Kansas City Southern Railway Company |
| 24-8012 |
| November 18, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5471612-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Thomas R. Chiavetta. Response of The Kansas City Southern Railway Company due 02/05/2025 [5474293] [24-8012] (RDB) [Entered: 01/13/2025 03:00 PM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions/petitions filed under Rule 5, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion/petition did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file a response, [ # 5471612-2 ], submitted by Thomas R. Chiavetta in 24-8012 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [24-8012]--[Edited 01/03/2025 by RDB to correct docket text] (RDB) [Entered: 01/03/2025 09:54 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Thomas R. Chiavetta for Respondent The Kansas City Southern Railway Company correcting [ # 5471612-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Attorney. [5471854] [24-8012] (TRC) [Entered: 01/03/2025 11:42 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to petition for 23(f) appeal, [ # 5458317-2 ], until 02/05/2025, filed by Attorney Thomas R. Chiavetta for Respondent The Kansas City Southern Railway Company w/service 01/02/2025. [5471612] [24-8012] (TRC) [Entered: 01/02/2025 05:00 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Respondents motion for extension of time to file response to petition for permission to appeal [ # 5463046-2 ] is granted in part. Respondent granted an additional 30 days in which to respond to the petition. Response is due on 01/6/2025. [5463448] [24-8012] (RDB) [Entered: 12/05/2024 03:09 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to petition for 23(f) appeal, [ # 5458317-2 ], until 01/23/2025, filed by Attorney Thomas R. Chiavetta for Respondent The Kansas City Southern Railway Company w/service 12/05/2024. [5463046] [24-8012] (TRC) [Entered: 12/05/2024 06:37 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5459345-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a response filed by Shelley Irene Ericsson. Response of The Kansas City Southern Railway Company due 12/09/2024 [5460401] [24-8012] (RDB) [Entered: 11/25/2024 04:34 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Shelley I. Ericsson for Respondent The Kansas City Southern Railway Company w/service 11/21/2024 [5459343] [24-8012] (SIE) [Entered: 11/21/2024 05:09 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file response to petition for 23(f) appeal, [ # 5458317-2 ], until 11/21/2024, filed by Attorney Shelley Irene Ericsson for Respondent The Kansas City Southern Railway Company w/service 11/21/2024. [5459345] [24-8012] (SIE) [Entered: 11/21/2024 05:35 PM] |
| Miscellaneous case docketed. [5458313] [24-8012] (RDB) [Entered: 11/19/2024 02:45 PM] |
| PETITION for permission to appeal under FRCvP 23(f) (Electronic) filed by Petitioners Justin Berberich, Ron Collins, Michael Hudson, Roderick Roberson, Caleb Schmitt, Chris Ulrich and Dylon White w/service 11/18/2024 [5458317] [24-8012] (RDB) [Entered: 11/19/2024 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
