Sherrel Courvelle v. Mike McCormick
Petitioner: Sherrel Jean Courvelle
Respondent: Mike McCormick, Sheriff of Garland County, Arkansas
Case Number: 25-1203
Filed: February 3, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2025 DOCUMENT FILED - Service Copy of Motion to Substitute Parties, filed by John Howard for Mike McCormick, w/service 04/03/2025. [5503080] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 04/03/2025 12:40 PM]
March 31, 2025 MOTION to substitute State of Arkansas for Mike McCormick, Sheriff, Garland County, Arkansas., filed by Attorney John Howard for Appellee Mike McCormick w/service 03/27/2025. [5501330] [25-1203] (JH) [Entered: 03/31/2025 10:46 AM]
March 31, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The motion to substitute party filed by John Howard [ # 5501330-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL.[5501362] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 03/31/2025 11:09 AM]
March 27, 2025 **LOCKED**RESPONSE in opposition to motion [ # 5497020-2 ], originating court document [ # 5489781-2 ] filed by Attorney John Howard for Appellee Mike McCormick , w/service 03/27/2025. [5500704] [25-1203]--[Edited 03/31/2025 by CJO to lock incorrectly filed document; Motion re-filed on 03/31/2025] (JH) [Entered: 03/27/2025 03:08 PM]
March 19, 2025 DOCUMENT FILED - Copy of Motion and Exhibits Received and Filed on 03/17/2025, Entered 03/18/2025, filed by Sherrel Jean Courvelle w/service 03/20/2025. [5497995] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 03/20/2025 08:39 AM]
March 18, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The motion to correct, filed by Appellant Sherrel Jean Courvelle [ # 5497020-2 ], is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5497022] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 03/18/2025 08:47 AM]
March 17, 2025 MOTION to Correct a Fraudulent Sentence Imposed in an Illegal Manner, filed by Appellant Sherrel Jean Courvelle, w/service 03/18/2025. [5497020] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 03/18/2025 08:46 AM]
February 26, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 02/25/2025, Text Order Granting Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. [5489781] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/26/2025 10:06 AM]
February 26, 2025 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 25-1203: In Forma Pauperis]. [5489783] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/26/2025 10:09 AM]
February 19, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 02/18/2025, Order Denying COA. [5487321] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/19/2025 03:27 PM]
February 3, 2025 Prisoner case docketed. [5481424] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/03/2025 01:29 PM]
February 3, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Report and Recommendation 10/30/2024, and Order 01/10/2025.[5481435] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/03/2025 01:39 PM]
February 3, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/24/2025, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5481438] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/03/2025 01:42 PM]
February 3, 2025 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5481440] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/03/2025 01:44 PM]
February 3, 2025 CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. This case is remanded to the district court for a determination of whether to issue a certificate of appealability, with directions that, if granted, the COA specify the issue or issues that are to be considered on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253; Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2005);Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d (8th Cir. 1997). [5481445] [25-1203] (CJO) [Entered: 02/03/2025 01:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sherrel Courvelle v. Mike McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sherrel Jean Courvelle
Represented By: Sherrel Jean Courvelle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mike McCormick, Sheriff of Garland County, Arkansas
Represented By: John Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?