Kenneth Pitts v. Dexter Payne, et al
| Kenneth Ray Pitts |
| Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections and State of Arkansas |
| 25-1392 |
| February 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The [ # 5489494-2 ] motion for authorization to file a successive habeas application in the district court is denied. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. Adp Apr 2025 [5506880] [25-1392] (HAG) [Entered: 04/16/2025 09:56 AM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5506888] [25-1392] (HAG) [Entered: 04/16/2025 10:04 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Jane Kelly, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5506878] [25-1392] (HAG) [Entered: 04/16/2025 09:55 AM] |
| REPLY to response [ # 5494407-2 ], filed by Petitioner Kenneth Ray Pitts, w/service 03/26/2025. [5500116] [25-1392] (CJO) [Entered: 03/26/2025 02:46 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion [ # 5489494-2 ] filed by Attorney James Hill for Respondents Dexter Payne and State of Arkansas , w/service 03/11/2025. [5494407] [25-1392] (JH) [Entered: 03/11/2025 12:57 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by James Hill for Respondents Dexter Payne and State of Arkansas w/service 02/26/2025 [5489976] [25-1392] (JH) [Entered: 02/26/2025 01:48 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5489492] [25-1392] (CJO) [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:16 PM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Kenneth Ray Pitts, w/service 02/25/2025. Response of Dexter Payne and State of Arkansas due 03/11/2025. [5489494] [25-1392] (CJO) [Entered: 02/25/2025 03:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
