Rick McCartney v. Chase Curl, et al
| Rick L. McCartney |
| Chase Curl, Deputy, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Zack Sebree, Corporal, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Aaron Richardson, Corporal, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Chris Jones, Deputy, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Tyler Sands, Deputy, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Cheryl Gillespie, Corporal, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Nikki Oaks Finner, Sergeant, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Stephen Humphreys, Jailer, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Chris West, Corporal, Missouri Highway Patrol, John David Swartz, Detective, Clinton Police Department, Jeremiah May Sullivan, Officer, Clinton Police Department, David Cody Hodges, Officer, Clinton Police Department, Dave Akeras, Sergeant, Clinton Police Department, Patrick Barry, Officer, Clinton Police Departmentd, Michael Scott Brandt, Officer, Clinton Police Department, Michael Nelson, Officer, Clinton Police Department and Kevin Miller, Police Chief, Clinton Police Department |
| 25-1578 |
| March 24, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***DOCUMENT LOCKED***APPEARANCE filed by Christopher L. Heigele for Appellees Dave Akeras, Patrick Barry, Michael Scott Brandt, David Cody Hodges, Kevin Miller, John David Swartz and Michael Nelson w/service 03/25/2025 [5499309] [25-1578]--[Edited 03/25/2025 by CRJ. Counsel has refiled the appearance to include appellant's address. See history #5499565. The telephone number in PACER is the correct number for counsel.] (CLH) [Entered: 03/25/2025 08:54 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by David S. Baker for Appellees Cheryl Gillespie, Stephen Humphreys, Chris Jones, Nikki Oaks Finner, Aaron Richardson, Tyler Sands and Zack Sebree w/service 03/25/2025 [5499537] [25-1578] (DSB) [Entered: 03/25/2025 01:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Christopher L. Heigele for Appellees Dave Akeras, Patrick Barry, Michael Scott Brandt, David Cody Hodges, Kevin Miller, Michael Nelson and John David Swartz w/service 03/25/2025 [5499565] [25-1578] (CLH) [Entered: 03/25/2025 01:39 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5499206] [25-1578] (CJO) [Entered: 03/24/2025 03:12 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 02/05/2025, Order 02/05/2025, Order 02/05/2025, Judgment 02/05/2025, and Order 03/24/2025. [5499211] [25-1578] (CJO) [Entered: 03/24/2025 03:17 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/21/2025, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5499215] [25-1578] (CJO) [Entered: 03/24/2025 03:20 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5499223] [25-1578] (CJO) [Entered: 03/24/2025 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
