In re: The Gathering Tree
| In re: The Gathering Tree, doing business as Eden Village |
| 25-1688 |
| April 8, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The petition for writ of prohibition is denied [ # 5504520-2 ]. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, JANE KELLY and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Apr 2025 [5506154] [25-1688] (BNW) [Entered: 04/14/2025 12:45 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5506162] [25-1688] (BNW) [Entered: 04/14/2025 12:58 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Jane Kelly, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5506150] [25-1688] (BNW) [Entered: 04/14/2025 12:41 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5504508] [25-1688] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2025 02:23 PM] |
| PETITION for Writ of Prohibition (Electronic) filed by Petitioner The Gathering Tree w/service 04/08/2025 [5504520] [25-1688] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2025 02:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: The Gathering Tree | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: The Gathering Tree, doing business as Eden Village | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Austin Stringer |
| Represented By: | Steven J. Blair |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.