Donald Bryan v. Matthew Whitaker, et al
Plaintiff: Donald Steven Bryan
Defendant: Matthew Whitaker, Springdale Police Crime Prevention Task Force, Sergeant Josh Kirmer, Springdale Police Department, Officer Mitchell Hammons, Springdale Police Department, Officer John Billingsley, Springdale Police Department and Officer Dustin Hartley, Springdale Police Department
Case Number: 25-1728
Filed: April 15, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2025 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5532599] [25-1728] (AMT) [Entered: 07/01/2025 09:56 AM]
July 1, 2025 MANDATE ISSUED. [5532605] [25-1728] (AMT) [Entered: 07/01/2025 10:01 AM]
June 9, 2025 CLERK ORDER: Appellant's brief was due on 05/27/2025, but has not been filed. It is hereby ordered that appellant show cause, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Donald Steven Bryan due 06/23/2025 [5525226] [25-1728] (DNS) [Entered: 06/09/2025 03:36 PM]
April 15, 2025 Prisoner case docketed. [5506541] [25-1728] (RDB) [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:06 AM]
April 15, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Report and Recommendation dated 11/12/2024, Order dated 12/6/2024, Report and Recommendation dated 3/14/2025, Order dated 4/1/2025, Order dated 4/14/2025 [5506554] [25-1728] (RDB) [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:13 AM]
April 15, 2025 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5506556] [25-1728] (RDB) [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:14 AM]
April 15, 2025 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Donald Steven Bryan due 05/27/2025. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5506562] [25-1728] (RDB) [Entered: 04/15/2025 11:20 AM]
April 15, 2025 APPEARANCE filed by Gabrielle Denise Gibson for Appellees Matthew Whitaker, Josh Kirmer, Mitchell Hammons and John Billingsley w/service 04/15/2025 [5506684] [25-1728] (GDG) [Entered: 04/15/2025 02:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Donald Bryan v. Matthew Whitaker, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Steven Bryan
Represented By: Donald Steven Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Whitaker, Springdale Police Crime Prevention Task Force
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Josh Kirmer, Springdale Police Department
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Mitchell Hammons, Springdale Police Department
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer John Billingsley, Springdale Police Department
Represented By: Gabrielle Denise Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Dustin Hartley, Springdale Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?