Aaron Flemons v. Valerie Westbrook
| Aaron Anthony Flemons |
| Valerie Westbrook, Classification Officer, EARU (originally named as Westbrook) and Nunn, Captain |
| 25-1745 |
| April 17, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5551515] [25-1745] (HAG) [Entered: 08/26/2025 04:58 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The [ # 5520717-2 ] motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been considered and is granted. The full $605 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The court remands the calculation of the installments and the collection of the fees to the district court. This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. Appellant's remaining pending motions [ # 5525909-2 ] [ # 5520720-2 ] are denied as moot. L. STEVEN GRASZ, DAVID R. STRAS and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp July 2025 [5538852] [25-1745] (HAG) [Entered: 07/18/2025 11:57 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges L. Steven Grasz, David R. Stras, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5538845] [25-1745] (HAG) [Entered: 07/18/2025 11:50 AM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Aaron Anthony Flemons requesting an update as to the status of this appeal, for an update as to appeal 24-3613, and for judicial misconduct complaint forms. Docket sheet for this appeal and 24-3613, copy of judgment and mandate in 24-3613, as well as judicial misconduct complaints forms mailed to appellant this day w/service 06/16/2025 [5527627] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 06/16/2025 01:19 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:motion to file belated response to order to show cause filed by Appellant Aaron Anthony Flemons in 25-1745 , [ # 5525909-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5525914] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 06/11/2025 10:21 AM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order for failure to pay docket fee [ # 5518317-2 ] filed by Party Aaron Anthony Flemons , w/service 06/09/2025. [5525913] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 06/11/2025 10:19 AM] |
| MOTION to file belated response to order to show cause, filed by Appellant Aaron Anthony Flemons w/service 06/09/2025. [5525909] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 06/11/2025 10:17 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:motion for continuance, or in the alternative request for stay on appeal filed by Appellant Aaron Anthony Flemons in 25-1745 , [ # 5520720-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5520727] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 05/28/2025 10:43 AM] |
| MOTION for continuance, or in the alternative request for stay on appeal, filed by Appellant Aaron Anthony Flemons w/service 05/27/2025. [5520720] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 05/28/2025 10:40 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Aaron Anthony Flemons w/service 05/27/2025. [5520717] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 05/28/2025 10:35 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Aaron Anthony Flemons due 06/03/2025 [5518317] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 05/20/2025 01:19 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of amended notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 9/27/2023, Order dated 11/15/2023, Order dated 3/14/2025, Judgment dated 3/14/2025, Order dated 4/22/2025. [5514090] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 05/06/2025 01:14 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 04/22/2025 denying motion for reconsideration, [5512230] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 05/01/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Findings and Partial Recommendation dated 9/26/2022, Order dated 12/20/2022, Findings and Partial Recommendation dated 5/8/2023, Order dated 9/27/2023, Order dated 11/15/2023, Findings and Recommendation dated 1/16/2025, Order dated 3/14/2025, Judgment dated 3/14/2025 [5507234] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 04/17/2025 09:17 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5507256] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 04/17/2025 09:40 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/15/2025, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5507253] [25-1745] (RDB) [Entered: 04/17/2025 09:38 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5507230] [25-1745]--[Edited 04/17/2025 by RDB to send corrected case opening letter] (RDB) [Entered: 04/17/2025 09:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
