Victor Perkins v. Dr. Malissa Klien, et al
| Victor Perkins |
| Malissa Klien, Dr. - Chief of Psychology, Emily Wakeman, Dr. - Staff Psychologist, McCarthy, Dr. - Staff Psychologist, Rozier, Dr. - Staff Psychologist and Dionne Hart, Dr. - Chief of Psychiatry |
| 25-1900 |
| May 5, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5559905] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 09/22/2025 08:52 AM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:Denying [ # 5550550-2 ] petition for enbanc rehearing filed by Appellant Victor Perkins. The petition for panel rehearing is also denied. Adp July 2025 [5557194] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 09/12/2025 09:41 AM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Appellant Victor Perkins in support of petition for enbanc rehearing and for rehearing by panel, filed by Victor Perkins in 25-1900 , Doc No. [ # 5550550-2 ] w/service 09/02/2025 by USCA8. [5553480] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 09/02/2025 03:11 PM] |
| PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Victor Perkins w/service 08/22/2025 by USCA8. [5550550] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 08/22/2025 01:50 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, BOBBY E. SHEPHERD and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp July 2025 [5544837] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 08/05/2025 12:40 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Bobby E. Shepherd, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5544835] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 08/05/2025 12:38 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Victor Perkins w/service 06/09/2025, Length: 4 pages , The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. [5525146] [25-1900] (NDG) [Entered: 06/09/2025 02:24 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 25-1900: In Forma Pauperis] [5514467] [25-1900] (MMH) [Entered: 05/07/2025 10:43 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The clerk order of May 5, 2025, regarding the remand to district court, Doc No. [5513793-2], is hereby vacated. [5514485] [25-1900] (MMH) [Entered: 05/07/2025 11:00 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5513780] [25-1900] (MMH) [Entered: 05/05/2025 04:23 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Report and Recommendation 3/7/25, Order Adopting R&R 4/15/25, Judgment 4/16/25, and Order on IFP 4/30/25 [5513790] [25-1900] (MMH) [Entered: 05/05/2025 04:44 PM] |
| **VACATED** CLERK ORDER:for limited remand. This case is remanded to district court for calculation and collection of appellate filing fees pursuant to Henderson v. Norris, 129F.3d 481 (8th Cir. 1997). [5513793] [25-1900] [5513793] [25-1900]--[Edited 05/07/2025 by MMH to vacate order] (MMH) [Entered: 05/05/2025 04:51 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5514469] [25-1900] (MMH) [Entered: 05/07/2025 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
