Robert Hook v. Michele Buckner
Petitioner: Robert Lowell Hook
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Case Number: 25-1973
Filed: May 16, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2025 MANDATE ISSUED. [5576267] [25-1973] (CRJ) [Entered: 11/07/2025 10:48 AM]
October 17, 2025 JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Kent E. Gipson is denied as moot [ # 5525996-2 ]. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, RALPH R. ERICKSON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Oct 2025 [5568859] [25-1973] (BNW) [Entered: 10/17/2025 10:31 AM]
October 15, 2025 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Ralph R. Erickson, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5568851] [25-1973] (BNW) [Entered: 10/17/2025 10:24 AM]
June 11, 2025 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Attorney Kent E. Gipson for Appellant Robert Lowell Hook w/service 06/11/2025. [5525996] [25-1973] (KEG) [Entered: 06/11/2025 11:37 AM]
May 16, 2025 Prisoner case docketed. [5517432] [25-1973] (CMH) [Entered: 05/16/2025 11:14 AM]
May 16, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorrandum Opinion & Order 03/25/25, Judgment 03/25/2025 and Order 05/15/2025. [5517440] [25-1973] (CMH) [Entered: 05/16/2025 11:26 AM]
May 16, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/13/2025, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5517441] [25-1973] (CMH) [Entered: 05/16/2025 11:27 AM]
May 16, 2025 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5517443] [25-1973] (CMH) [Entered: 05/16/2025 11:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Hook v. Michele Buckner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Lowell Hook
Represented By: Kent E. Gipson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michele Buckner
Represented By: Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General
Represented By: Andrew Crane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?