United States v. Kyle Beck
| United States of America |
| Kyle Beck |
| 25-2321 |
| July 3, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5555561] [25-2321] (AMT) [Entered: 09/09/2025 09:40 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5554306-2 ] motion to dismiss case filed by Gregory John Sperlich., The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5555558] [25-2321] (AMT) [Entered: 09/09/2025 09:38 AM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Gregory John Sperlich for Appellant Kyle Beck w/service 08/26/2025. [5554306] [25-2321] (JES) [Entered: 09/04/2025 11:02 AM] |
| ****DOCUMENT LOCKED****CONSENT of Appellant Kyle Beck and Appellee United States of America, to motion to dismiss case. w/service 08/26/2025 [5551278] [25-2321]--[Edited 09/04/2025 by JES] ***This was refiled under correct event, See history #: 5554306.*** (GJS) [Entered: 08/26/2025 11:15 AM] |
| Tendered motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal received from Appellant Kyle Beck w/service 08/05/2025 [5544545] [25-2321] (ASL) [Entered: 08/05/2025 08:20 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5534556] [25-2321] (ASL) [Entered: 07/08/2025 09:41 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 7/2/2025, SEALED Order filed 7/1/2025, and docket entries, [5534576] [25-2321] (ASL) [Entered: 07/08/2025 09:53 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appointing Gregory John Sperlich for Kyle Beck under the Criminal Justice Act. [5534581] [25-2321] (ASL) [Entered: 07/08/2025 09:55 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: This criminal appeal involves a child victim or child witness. In accordance with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 3509(d)(2) regarding confidentiality of information and privacy protection, all papers filed with this court which disclose the name of or any information concerning a child shall be sealed. (SEE order for complete details) [5534585] [25-2321] (ASL) [Entered: 07/08/2025 09:59 AM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 07/29/2025. Transcript due 07/29/2025. Brief of appellant Kyle Beck due 08/12/2025. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5534593] [25-2321] (ASL) [Entered: 07/08/2025 10:01 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Heather Knox for Appellee United States of America w/service 07/08/2025 [5534760] [25-2321] (HCK) [Entered: 07/08/2025 01:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Kyle Beck | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Heather Colleen Knox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kyle Beck | |
| Represented By: | Gregory John Sperlich |
| Represented By: | Kyle Beck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.