Terry Lee v. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, et al
| Terry Antonio Lee |
| Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Governor of State (originally named as Sarah Huckabee), Board of Corrections, Dexter Payne, Director, Thomas Rowland, Supervisor, Internal Affairs, William Straughn, Assistant Director, James Shipman, Warden, Tucker Max Unit, Maurice Culcalger, Assistant Warden, Tucker Max Unit, Joseph P. Mahoney, Major, Tucker Max Unit, Kevin Patterson, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Blackmon, Sgt., Field Rider, Tucker Max Unit, Brooks, Cpl., Tucker Max Unit, Burnett, Cpl., Tucker Max Unit, Matthew Elias, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, C. Jackson, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Charlie Thomason, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Terri Hollingsworth, Pulaski Circuit Court Clerk, Tim Griffin, Attorney General, Jordan B. Slayden, Lt., Tucker Max Unit, Karen Davis, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Julius John Gerard, IV, Assistant Attorney General, Leigh Patterson, Prosecuting Attorney/Deputy, Haley Trantham, PREA, Numery, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Jeremy Lee, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, J. Sundine, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, A. Jackson, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Clark, Captain, Tucker Max Unit, Cantrell Bass, Captain, Tucker Max Unit, Karma Throne, Lt., Tucker Max Unit, Christopher Grant, Cpl., Tucker Max Unit, Cynthia D. Conway, Lt., Tucker Max Unit, Nicholas D. Swiney, Lt., Tucker Max Unit, Melvin Wooten, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit (originally named as Melvin Wooten), Justin D. Coleman, Cpl., Tucker Max Unit, Tyraneka Sims, Sgt., Tucker Max Unit, Brandeisjha M. Burnett, Classification Officer, K. Love, Business Manager, Jaqueline Davis-Smith, Program specialist/supervisor law library, Tucker Max Unit, Isom, Sgt., Tucker Max, Spencer, sick call nurse, Tucker Max Unit, Seamster, APN, Tucker Max Unit, C. Blizard, Tucker Max Unit, James Beck, Doctor, Tucker Max Unit, Aundrea Culclager, Director, Chris Horan, MD., WellPath, WellPath and M. Agil, Health Service Administrator, WellPath |
| 25-2482 |
| July 25, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5597949] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 01/16/2026 09:00 AM] |
| Mail sent to Appellant Terry Antonio Lee on 12/15/2025 was returned on 01/13/2026 Reason Mail Returned: Refused. Resending NDA of 12/15/2025. [5597812] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 01/15/2026 02:47 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:The petition for rehearing is denied as overlength. [ # 5589791-2 ] Adp Oct 2025 [5595504] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 01/09/2026 09:55 AM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Terry Antonio Lee w/service 12/18/2025 by USCA8 [5589791] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/18/2025 12:42 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:Granting [ # 5577719-2 ] motion for a 30-day extension of time to file rehearing filed by Appellant Terry Antonio Lee. Petition for rehearing due on 12/17/2025. No further extensions of time will be granted. Adp Oct 2025 [5579032] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 11/17/2025 11:52 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Terry Antonio Lee w/service by USCA8 11/13/2025. [5577719] [25-2482] (DAK) [Entered: 11/13/2025 08:08 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A., The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been considered and is granted. The full $605 appellate and docketing fees are assessed against the appellant. Appellant will be permitted to pay the fee by installment method contained in 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(b)(2). The court remands the calculation of the installments and the collection of the fees to the district court. [ # 5548274-2 ] BOBBY E. SHEPHERD, JANE KELLY and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Oct 2025 [5568034] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/15/2025 02:23 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Bobby E. Shepherd, Jane Kelly, David R. Stras in St. Louis [5568027] [25-2482] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/15/2025 02:19 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Party Terry Antonio Lee w/service 08/15/2025. [5548274] [25-2482] (RDB) [Entered: 08/15/2025 01:25 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5541624] [25-2482] (RDB) [Entered: 07/25/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Recommendation dated 9/3/2024, Order dated 1/21/2025, Judgment dated 1/21/2025, Order dated 7/17/2025 [5541626] [25-2482] (RDB) [Entered: 07/25/2025 04:04 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5541627] [25-2482] (RDB) [Entered: 07/25/2025 04:04 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 08/22/2025, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5541629] [25-2482] (RDB) [Entered: 07/25/2025 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
