Mitchell Sanderson v. Kelly Cole
Plaintiff: Mitchell S. Sanderson
Defendant: Kelly Cole, Walsh County State's Attorney
Case Number: 25-2519
Filed: July 31, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2025 MANDATE ISSUED. [5579806] [25-2519] (JES) [Entered: 11/19/2025 09:21 AM]
October 29, 2025 JUDGMENT FILED - The motions to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Mitchell S. Sanderson are granted [ # 5546274-2 ] [ # 5543648-2 ]. This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2025 [5573095] [25-2519] (JES) [Entered: 10/29/2025 03:30 PM]
October 28, 2025 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5573033] [25-2519] (JES) [Entered: 10/29/2025 02:41 PM]
August 8, 2025 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Mitchell S. Sanderson w/service 08/08/2025. [5546274] [25-2519] (ASL) [Entered: 08/08/2025 01:50 PM]
August 8, 2025 Tendered Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis received from Appellant Mitchell S. Sanderson. [5546201] [25-2519] (CJO) [Entered: 08/08/2025 11:50 AM]
July 31, 2025 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 25-2519: pending] [5543622] [25-2519] (MMH) [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:56 PM]
July 31, 2025 Civil case docketed. [5543624] [25-2519] (MMH) [Entered: 07/31/2025 03:57 PM]
July 31, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dismissing complaint 4/25/25, Judgment 4/25/25, and Order on misc motions 7/2/25 [5543639] [25-2519]--[Edited 08/28/2025 by EDG to rename 7/2/25 order]--[Edited 08/28/2025 by EDG] (MMH) [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:14 PM]
July 31, 2025 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5543640] [25-2519] (MMH) [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:14 PM]
July 31, 2025 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Mitch Sanderson w/service 07/31/2025. [5543648] [25-2519] (MMH) [Entered: 07/31/2025 04:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mitchell Sanderson v. Kelly Cole
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kelly Cole, Walsh County State's Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitchell S. Sanderson
Represented By: Mitchell S. Sanderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?