Scott Ramey v. Warden, MCF-Rush City
| Scott Wade Ramey |
| Warden MCF-Rush City |
| 25-2627 |
| August 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT FILED - Request for a certificate of appealability for case filed by Scott Wade Ramey. w/service 10/17/2025 [5568900] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 10/17/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 10/06/2025 denying Ramey's motion for COA and his application for COA; and granting IFP on appeal, [5565522] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 10/07/2025 03:54 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 25-2627: from due to In Forma Pauperis] [5565524] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 10/07/2025 03:55 PM] |
| Tendered trust account statement, various certificates received from Appellant Scott Wade Ramey w/service 09/08/2025 [5555231] [25-2627] (RDB) [Entered: 09/08/2025 11:55 AM] |
| INMATE TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT and certificates filed by Scott Wade Ramey on 08/22/2025[5557166] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 09/12/2025 09:19 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5549139] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:21 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 8/4/2025, R & R filed 5/1/2025, Order filed 7/23/2025, Judgment filed 7/24/2025, Order filed 8/7/2025, and docket entries, [5549149] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:30 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/09/2025, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5549150] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:31 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5549161] [25-2627] (ASL) [Entered: 08/19/2025 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Scott Ramey v. Warden, MCF-Rush City | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Scott Wade Ramey | |
| Represented By: | Scott Wade Ramey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden MCF-Rush City | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Rolf Ragatz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
