Alveto Rivera v. Mark Gray
| Alveto Rivera |
| Mark Gray, sued in their individual capacities and in their official capacities |
| 25-2757 |
| September 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petitions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| U.S. Supreme Court Notice of cert filed in the Supreme Court on 11/20/2025, case No. 25-6632 [5600734] [25-2757] (AMT) [Entered: 01/26/2026 08:38 AM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5573218] [25-2757] (DNS) [Entered: 10/30/2025 08:33 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2025 [5564422] [25-2757] (DNS) [Entered: 10/03/2025 01:24 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5564420] [25-2757] (DNS) [Entered: 10/03/2025 01:23 PM] |
| Tendered Appellant's Brief received from Appellant Alveto Rivera [5563591] [25-2757] (MMH) [Entered: 10/01/2025 04:47 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Alveto Rivera w/service by USCA8 10/02/2025 , Length: 17 pages. , The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. [5563798] [25-2757] (DNS) [Entered: 10/02/2025 11:04 AM] |
| Re-mailed correspondence - docketing letter [ # 5555575-2 ] and clerk order case proceeding on of (need file) [ # 5555596-3 ] to Appellant at updated address [25-2757] (MMH) [Entered: 09/24/2025 09:05 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5555575] [25-2757] (MMH) [Entered: 09/09/2025 09:49 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Report and Recommendation 6/2/25, Order Accepting R&R 7/28/25, Judgment 7/28/25, notice of appeal, Order granting IFP 9/4/25, and docket entries [5555594] [25-2757] (MMH) [Entered: 09/09/2025 10:02 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5555596] [25-2757] (MMH) [Entered: 09/09/2025 10:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Alveto Rivera v. Mark Gray | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alveto Rivera | |
| Represented By: | Alveto Rivera |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mark Gray, sued in their individual capacities and in their official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
