James Tyson, Sr. v. Brian Foster, et al
| James Charles Tyson, Sr. |
| Brian Foster, IDOC Employee, Brad Hoenig, IDOC Employee, Josh Baal, Lindsay Stupka, IDOC Employee and Activity Director, IDOC Employee |
| 25-2787 |
| September 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGE ORDER:Denying [ # 5604584-2 ] petition for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant James Charles Tyson, Sr. Adp Dec 2025 [5612195] [25-2787] (BNW) [Entered: 02/26/2026 08:24 AM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant James Charles Tyson, Sr. w/service 02/04/2026. [5604584] [25-2787] (BNW) [Entered: 02/04/2026 12:19 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant James Charles Tyson, Sr. is denied [ # 5562110-2 ]. This appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or to demonstrate eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). DISMISSED. LAVENSKI R. SMITH, L. STEVEN GRASZ and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Dec 2025 [5594128] [25-2787] (BNW) [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:20 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Lavenski R. Smith, L. Steven Grasz, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5594115] [25-2787] (BNW) [Entered: 01/06/2026 03:11 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant James Charles Tyson, Sr. w/service 09/26/2025. [5562110] [25-2787] (CBO) [Entered: 09/29/2025 08:06 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 09/10/2025 denying motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5557861] [25-2787] (CBO) [Entered: 09/15/2025 11:16 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5556929] [25-2787] (CBO) [Entered: 09/11/2025 02:03 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Order Denying IFP (3X) filed 7/2/2025, Order of Dismissal filed 8/26/2025, and Notice of Appeal filed 9/9/2025. [5556938] [25-2787] (CBO) [Entered: 09/11/2025 02:11 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to either 1) pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or 2) to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, and to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order with the required pleading and motion within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 10/14/2025 [5556948] [25-2787] (CBO) [Entered: 09/11/2025 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
