Anthony Dan v. State of Nebraska, et al
| Anthony T. Dan |
| State of Nebraska, Cherl Finn, Medical Staff - individual capacity, Medical Staff, Medical Staff - individual capacity, Walls, Case Manager - individual capacity, Boyer-Sears, Lieutenant - individual capacity, Brooks, Officer - individual capacity, Beebe, Case Manager - individual capacity, McNair, Case Manager - individual capacity, Busboom, Assistant Warden - individual capacity, Craig Gable, Warden - individual capacity, Dr. B. Hollister, Mental Health Representative - individual capacity, C. Hinzman, Classification Representative - individual capacity, R. Brittenham, Intelligence Representative - individual capacity, Diane Sabaksta-Rine, Chief of Operations - individual capacity, Robert Madsen, Deputy Director - individual capacity and Rob Jeffreys, Director - individual capacity |
| 25-2809 |
| September 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding Motion to Amend Arrest Warrants. [5605803] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 02/06/2026 04:08 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Motion to Amend Arrest Warrants filed by Anthony T. Dan. w/service 02/06/2026 [5605799] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 02/06/2026 04:06 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:Denying [ # 5594982-2 ] petition for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Anthony T. Dan. Adp Dec 2025 [5602767] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 01/30/2026 10:43 AM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel WITH ATTACHED EXHIBITS filed by Appellant Anthony T. Dan w/service 01/08/2026 by USCA8. [5594982] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 01/08/2026 09:28 AM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5591965] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 12/30/2025 08:15 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. Appellant's motion to issue arrest warrants [ # 5584166-2 ] is denied. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Dec 2025 [5585770] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 12/08/2025 02:45 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5585759] [25-2809] (NDG) [Entered: 12/08/2025 02:41 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:motion to issue arrest warrants filed by Appellant Anthony T. Dan in 25-2809 , [ # 5584166-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5584168] [25-2809] (RDB) [Entered: 12/03/2025 02:11 PM] |
| MOTION to issue arrest warrants, filed by Appellant Anthony T. Dan w/service 12/01/2025. [5584166] [25-2809] (RDB) [Entered: 12/03/2025 02:10 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5557813] [25-2809] (RDB) [Entered: 09/15/2025 10:54 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 8/12/2025, Judgment dated 8/12/2025, Order dated 9/12/2025 [5557821] [25-2809] (RDB) [Entered: 09/15/2025 10:58 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5557823] [25-2809] (RDB) [Entered: 09/15/2025 10:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
