In re: Leroy Simpson-Brown
Petitioner: In re: Leroy Simpson-Brown
Case Number: 25-2864
Filed: September 18, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2025 JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5567237-2 ] petition for enbanc rehearing filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown. The petition for panel rehearing is also denied.. Adp Oct 2025 [5575093] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 11/05/2025 07:44 AM]
October 22, 2025 JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5566590-2 ] motion to recall the mandate filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown. Adp Oct 2025 [5570229] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 10/22/2025 08:43 AM]
October 9, 2025 JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5562099-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown.; Denying [ # 5560425-2 ] petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown. Mandate shall issue forthwith., DENIED. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2025 [5566391] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 10/09/2025 01:23 PM]
October 9, 2025 MANDATE ISSUED. [5566396] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 10/09/2025 01:27 PM]
October 9, 2025 ***LOCKED DOCUMENT*** PETITION for initial Hearing En Banc filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown w/service 10/09/2025 [5566588] [25-2864] --[Edited 10/14/2025 by DNS] Incorrect filing event. Refer to docket ID no. 5567237. (LS) [Entered: 10/09/2025 05:19 PM]
October 9, 2025 MOTION to recall the mandate, filed by Party Leroy Simpson-Brown w/service 10/09/2025. [5566590] [25-2864] (LS) [Entered: 10/09/2025 05:38 PM]
October 9, 2025 ***LOCKED DOCUMENT*** STATEMENT of issues filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown - w/service 10/09/2025. [5566592] [25-2864] --[Edited 10/15/2025 by DNS] Incorrect filing event. See docket ID no. 5568003 (LS) [Entered: 10/09/2025 06:57 PM]
October 9, 2025 PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown w/service 10/14/2025 [5567237] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 10/14/2025 09:47 AM]
October 9, 2025 MEMORANDUM of Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown in support of petition for enbanc rehearing, petition for rehearing by panel, filed by Leroy Simpson-Brown in 25-2864 , Doc No. [ # 5567237-3 ], and motion to recall the mandate, filed by Leroy Simpson-Brown in 25-2864 , Doc No. [ # 5566590-2 ] w/service 10/15/2025. [5568003] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 10/15/2025 01:19 PM]
October 2, 2025 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5566385] [25-2864] (DNS) [Entered: 10/09/2025 01:17 PM]
September 28, 2025 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Party Leroy Simpson-Brown w/service 09/28/2025. [5562099] [25-2864] (LS) [Entered: 09/28/2025 04:48 PM]
September 18, 2025 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5560418] [25-2864] (CMH) [Entered: 09/23/2025 10:36 AM]
September 18, 2025 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Leroy Simpson-Brown w/service 09/23/2025. [5560425] [25-2864] (CMH) [Entered: 09/23/2025 10:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Leroy Simpson-Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: Leroy Simpson-Brown
Represented By: Leroy Simpson-Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?