Nico Wofford v. Craig Gable, et al
Petitioner: Nico Wofford
Respondent: Craig Gable, TSCI Warden and Rob Jeffreys, NDCS Director
Case Number: 25-2972
Filed: October 6, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2025 JUDGE ORDER:Denying [ # 5586297-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a pro se petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Nico Wofford. Adp Nov 2025 [5587169] [25-2972] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/11/2025 12:43 PM]
December 3, 2025 MANDATE ISSUED. [5583949] [25-2972] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/03/2025 10:31 AM]
December 3, 2025 MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing, filed by Appellant Nico Wofford w/service 12/09/2025 by USCA8. [5586297] [25-2972] (CRJ) [Entered: 12/09/2025 02:14 PM]
November 3, 2025 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5574464] [25-2972] (CRJ) [Entered: 11/03/2025 02:45 PM]
November 3, 2025 JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Nov 2025 [5574466] [25-2972] (CRJ) [Entered: 11/03/2025 02:48 PM]
October 7, 2025 APPEARANCE filed by Jordan Osborne for Appellees Rob Jeffreys and Craig Gable w/service 10/07/2025 [5565286] [25-2972] (JMO) [Entered: 10/07/2025 11:23 AM]
October 6, 2025 Prisoner case docketed. [5564866] [25-2972] (CMH) [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:17 PM]
October 6, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 09/09/2025, Judgment 09/09/2025, and Order 10/02/2025. [5564909] [25-2972] (CMH) [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:44 PM]
October 6, 2025 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5564910] [25-2972] (CMH) [Entered: 10/06/2025 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nico Wofford v. Craig Gable, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nico Wofford
Represented By: Nico Wofford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Craig Gable, TSCI Warden
Represented By: Jordan Marie Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rob Jeffreys, NDCS Director
Represented By: Jordan Marie Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?