Jimmy Stanley v. Puryear, et al
Plaintiff: Jimmy Dewayne Stanley
Defendant: Puryear, Judge, Drew County Courthouse and Doe, "Darnell" Jail Doctor
Case Number: 25-2983
Filed: October 7, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2026 MANDATE ISSUED. [5614265] [25-2983] (CRJ) [Entered: 03/03/2026 02:03 PM]
February 5, 2026 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant's motions for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied. [ # 5588327-2 ] [ # 5593554-2 ] This appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or demonstrate eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The motion for discovery is denied as moot. [ # 5584645-2 ] JANE KELLY, L. STEVEN GRASZ and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Jan 2026 [5605015] [25-2983] (CRJ) [Entered: 02/05/2026 10:02 AM]
January 23, 2026 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Jane Kelly, L. Steven Grasz, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5605009] [25-2983] (CRJ) [Entered: 02/05/2026 09:53 AM]
January 5, 2026 Second MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, w/service 01/05/2026. [5593554] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 01/05/2026 03:25 PM]
December 15, 2025 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, w/service 12/15/2025. [5588327] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 12/15/2025 02:13 PM]
December 5, 2025 CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Jimmy Dewayne Stanley due 12/19/2025. [5585301] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 12/05/2025 03:12 PM]
December 3, 2025 MOTION for Discovery, filed by Appellant Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, w/service 12/04/2025. [5584645] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 12/04/2025 12:17 PM]
November 20, 2025 DOCUMENT FILED - Notice of Filing a Motion for An Appeal, filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, w/service 11/20/2025. [5580532] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 11/20/2025 01:47 PM]
October 28, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 10/28/2025, denying motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. [5572246] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 10/28/2025 10:49 AM]
October 28, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to either 1) pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or 2) to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, and to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order with the required pleading and motion within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 11/28/2025 [5572254] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 10/28/2025 10:56 AM]
October 17, 2025 DOCUMENT FILED - Notice consisting of notice of appeal supplement for appeal (forwarded by district court) filed by Jimmy Dewayne Stanley, w/service 10/17/2025. [5569054] [25-2983] (CMH) [Entered: 10/17/2025 03:58 PM]
October 7, 2025 Prisoner case docketed. [5565279] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 10/07/2025 11:17 AM]
October 7, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 09/25/2025, Judgment 09/25/2025, and Pro Se Notice 10/06/2025. [5565287] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 10/07/2025 11:26 AM]
October 7, 2025 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5565291] [25-2983] (CJO) [Entered: 10/07/2025 11:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jimmy Stanley v. Puryear, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy Dewayne Stanley
Represented By: Jimmy Dewayne Stanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Puryear, Judge, Drew County Courthouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe, "Darnell" Jail Doctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?