Allen Moore v. Weaver
| Allen Moore |
| Officer Weaver, Hempstead County Detention Center |
| 25-3054 |
| October 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5579830] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 11/19/2025 09:45 AM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5573846-2 ] motion for reconsideration filed by Appellant Allen Moore. Denying [ # 5573844-2 ] motion for extension of time to file a petition for rehearing filed by Appellant Allen Moore. Adp Oct 2025 [5575070] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 11/04/2025 04:25 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing until 11/25/2025, filed by Appellant Allen Moore w/service by USCA8 10/31/2025. [5573844] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:49 AM] |
| MOTION for reconsideration of judgment dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction, [ # 5570577-2 ], filed by Appellant Allen Moore w/service by USCA8 10/31/2025. [5573846] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 10/31/2025 11:52 AM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: Denying [ # 5572282-2 ] motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Allen Moore. Adp Oct 2025 [5573133] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 10/29/2025 04:00 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Allen Moore w/service by USCA8 10/28/2025. [5572282] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 10/28/2025 11:13 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2025 [5570577] [25-3054] (HAG) [Entered: 10/22/2025 03:14 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5568265] [25-3054] (CJO) [Entered: 10/16/2025 08:24 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order 04/17/2025, and Judgment 04/17/2025. [5568273] [25-3054] (CJO) [Entered: 10/16/2025 08:31 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. Upon review of the district court's record, the appellant was previously allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. This case is remanded to district court for calculation and collection of appellate filing fees pursuant to Henderson v. Norris, 129F.3d 481 (8th Cir. 1997). [5568275] [25-3054] (CJO) [Entered: 10/16/2025 08:34 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by JaNan Arnold Thomas for Appellee Weaver w/service 10/16/2025 [5568323] [25-3054] (JAT) [Entered: 10/16/2025 09:37 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 10/16/2025, Order Regarding Collection of Filing Fee. [5568479] [25-3054] (CJO) [Entered: 10/16/2025 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Allen Moore v. Weaver | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Allen Moore | |
| Represented By: | Allen Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Officer Weaver, Hempstead County Detention Center | |
| Represented By: | JaNan Arnold Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
