Travon Higgins v. Stephen Lane, et al
| Travon D. Higgins |
| Stephen Lane, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, William F. Straughn, Deputy Director, ADC, Moses Jackson, Deputy Warden, ADC, Scott Taylor, Major, ADC, Michael Richardson, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit and Todd Ball, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit |
| 25-3105 |
| October 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5579751] [25-3105] (NDG) [Entered: 11/19/2025 08:00 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as premature. BOBBY E. SHEPHERD, JANE KELLY and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Oct 2025 [5572584] [25-3105] (NDG) [Entered: 10/28/2025 04:55 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 10/24/2025, Order Regarding Remand. [5571693] [25-3105] (CJO) [Entered: 10/27/2025 09:35 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5570735] [25-3105] (CJO) [Entered: 10/23/2025 09:24 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation 09/24/2025, and Order 10/08/2025. [5570747] [25-3105] (CJO) [Entered: 10/23/2025 09:35 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. Upon review of the district court's record, the appellant was previously allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915 as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. This case is remanded to district court for calculation and collection of appellate filing fees pursuant to Henderson v. Norris, 129F.3d 481 (8th Cir. 1997). [5570754] [25-3105] (CJO) [Entered: 10/23/2025 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
