David Elgersma v. NICS, et al
Plaintiff: David Elgersma
Defendant: NICS, (part of the FBI), Scheels, Cabela's, Inc. and Fleet Farm
Case Number: 25-3200
Filed: November 4, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2026 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5601329] [25-3200] (NDG) [Entered: 01/27/2026 10:06 AM]
January 27, 2026 MANDATE ISSUED. [5601332] [25-3200] (NDG) [Entered: 01/27/2026 10:09 AM]
December 15, 2025 CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dockt fee due on 01/06/2026. [5588420] [25-3200] (CBO) [Entered: 12/15/2025 03:45 PM]
November 4, 2025 Civil case docketed. [5574812] [25-3200] (CBO) [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:10 PM]
November 4, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Order of Dismissal filed 7/10/2025, Judgment filed 7/11/2025, and Notice of Appeal filed 11/3/2025. [5574827] [25-3200] (CBO) [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:20 PM]
November 4, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 11/25/2025, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5574830] [25-3200] (CBO) [Entered: 11/04/2025 12:22 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: David Elgersma v. NICS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Elgersma
Represented By: David Elgersma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NICS, (part of the FBI)
Represented By: Erin Secord
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scheels
Represented By: Jeremiah Charles Hollembeak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cabela's, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fleet Farm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?