Elizabeth Martin v. Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri, et al
Plaintiff: Elizabeth J. Martin
Defendant: Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Chief Judge Mary R. Russell
Case Number: 25-3230
Filed: November 7, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2026 Paper copies Appellee/Respondent brief, [ # 5616134-2 ] filed by Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell 10 paper copies received. Reply brief of Elizabeth J. Martin due 04/02/2026 [5618500] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 03/13/2026 02:53 PM]
March 9, 2026 BRIEF FILED - APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell, w/service 03/09/2026 , Length: 7 pages 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell due 03/16/2026 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Appellant's reply brief deadline will be set, based on the Certificate of Service in appellee's paper brief. [5616134] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 03/09/2026 11:56 AM]
March 9, 2026 APPELLEE brief of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5616081] [25-3230] (NT) [Entered: 03/09/2026 11:28 AM]
March 9, 2026 Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Nicolas Taulbee for Appellees Mary R. Russell and Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri. [5616015] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 03/09/2026 10:41 AM]
March 6, 2026 APPELLEE brief of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5615818] [25-3230] (NT) [Entered: 03/06/2026 04:50 PM]
March 6, 2026 APPEARANCE filed by Nicolas Taulbee for Appellees Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell w/service 03/06/2026 [5615734] [25-3230] (NT) [Entered: 03/06/2026 02:48 PM]
February 10, 2026 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 03/20/2026, filed by Attorney Jessica L. Ward for Appellees Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell w/service 02/10/2026. [5606649] [25-3230] (JLW) [Entered: 02/10/2026 12:31 PM]
February 10, 2026 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5606649-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Jessica L. Ward. Brief of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell due 03/20/2026. [5606771] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 02/10/2026 03:30 PM]
January 20, 2026 BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF with EXHIBITS filed by Elizabeth J. Martin. w/service 01/20/2026 by USCA8, Length: 10 pages. 6 copies. Brief of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri and Mary R. Russell due on 02/19/2026 [5598803] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 01/20/2026 03:26 PM]
December 30, 2025 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5592333-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Appellant Elizabeth J. Martin. Appellant brief of Elizabeth J. Martin due 01/14/2026. [5592337] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 12/30/2025 03:34 PM]
December 29, 2025 MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 01/14/2026, filed by Appellant Elizabeth J. Martin w/service by USCA8 12/30/2025. [5592333] [25-3230] (DAK) [Entered: 12/30/2025 03:31 PM]
November 20, 2025 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Elizabeth J. Martin due 12/30/2025. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5580606] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:54 PM]
November 20, 2025 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 25-3230: In Forma Pauperis] [5580604] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:52 PM]
November 20, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court order of 11/19/2025 granting plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5580603] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/20/2025 02:52 PM]
November 7, 2025 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 10/09/2025 and Judgment 10/09/2025. [5576131] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/07/2025 09:18 AM]
November 7, 2025 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5576141] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/07/2025 09:21 AM]
November 7, 2025 CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 11/28/2025, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5576134] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/07/2025 09:19 AM]
November 7, 2025 Civil case docketed. [5576109] [25-3230] (CMH) [Entered: 11/07/2025 08:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Elizabeth Martin v. Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth J. Martin
Represented By: Elizabeth J. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief Disciplinary Counsel of Missouri
Represented By: Jessica L. Ward
Represented By: Nicolas Taulbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chief Judge Mary R. Russell
Represented By: Jessica L. Ward
Represented By: Nicolas Taulbee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?