Richard Williams, et al v. Nimbus Wind Farm
| Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC, a Deleware Limited Liability Company |
| Richard Williams, Glenda Williams, Michael Edwards, Angela Edwards, Eric Berry, Robert P. Keys, Charlette Keys, Rubey Stinebrickner, Gary McMahan, Wanda McMahan, Russell L. Langston, Trustee of the Langston Trust dated March 3, 2021, Jeanne F. Langston, Trustee of the Langston Trust dated March 3, 2021, Colette Leanna Cook-Tabor, James Tabor, Delbert James Miller, Co-Trustee of the Miller Family Trust u/t/d March 12, 2012, Hazel Lavon Miller, Co-Trustee of the Miller Family Trust u/t/d March 12, 2012, Cary W. Tate, Julia A. Tate, Ryan Sample, Janell Cape, Roger McMahan, Cormal McMahan, Alfred Benjamin Peter Brock, Co-Trustee of The Alfred and Jessica Brock Revocable Trust dated June 11, 2024, Jessica Lynn Brock, Co-Trustee of The Alfred and Jessica Brock Revocable Trust dated June 11, 2024, Eduardo Acevedo Ponce, Alejandra Sanchez, Andrew Peterson and Monica Peterson |
| County Judge David Writer, Carroll County, Arkansas, in his official capacity and Carroll County, Arkansas, a political subdivision of the State of Arkansas |
| 25-8005 |
| August 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Nimbus Farm's motion to dismiss [ # 5554117-2 ] is hereby construed as a motion to withdraw the petition for permission to appeal and is granted, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. Respondents' motion to file brief out of time [ # 5550392-2 ] is denied as moot. Mandate shall issue forthwith. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Aug 2025 [5559841] [25-8005] (NDG) [Entered: 09/19/2025 04:36 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5559846] [25-8005] (NDG) [Entered: 09/19/2025 04:44 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Colette Noel Brashears for Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC, Alexander T. Jones for Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC and Andrew King for Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC w/service 09/03/2025. [5554117] [25-8005] (AK) [Entered: 09/03/2025 04:56 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 25-8005: pending] [5553000] [25-8005] (RDB) [Entered: 08/29/2025 01:07 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion file brief out of time [ # 5550392-2 ] filed by Colette Noel Brashears for Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC, Alexander T. Jones for Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC and Andrew King for Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC , w/service 08/25/2025. [5550872] [25-8005] (AK) [Entered: 08/25/2025 12:41 PM] |
| MOTION to file brief out of time, filed by Attorney Matthew R. Bishop for Respondents Eric Berry, Alfred Benjamin Peter Brock, Jessica Lynn Brock, Janell Cape, Colette Leanna Cook-Tabor, Angela Edwards, Michael Edwards, Charlette Keys, Robert P. Keys, Jeanne F. Langston, Russell L. Langston, Cormal McMahan, Gary McMahan, Roger McMahan, Wanda McMahan, Delbert James Miller, Hazel Lavon Miller, Andrew Peterson, Monica Peterson, Eduardo Acevedo Ponce, Ryan Sample, Alejandra Sanchez, Rubey Stinebrickner, James Tabor, Cary W. Tate, Julia A. Tate, Glenda Williams and Richard Williams w/service 08/22/2025. [5550392] [25-8005] (MRB) [Entered: 08/22/2025 09:11 AM] |
| Miscellaneous case docketed. [5545909] [25-8005] (RDB) [Entered: 08/07/2025 03:17 PM] |
| PETITION for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1453(c) w/ Addendum. (Electronic) filed by Petitioner Nimbus Wind Farm, LLC w/service 08/07/2025 [5545911] [25-8005]--[Edited 08/07/2025 by EDG to attach the Addendum] (RDB) [Entered: 08/07/2025 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.