United States v. Cortez Harris
| United States of America |
| Cortez Deandre Harris |
| 26-1085 |
| January 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The government's Motion to Dismiss Appeal & Motion to Expedite Review is granted [ # 5597981-2 ]. Cortez Harris's interlocutory appeal of the district court's denial of the motion to stay is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm the district court's denial of the emergency motion to reconsider the pretrial detention under Fed. R. App. P. 9(a). The motion for stay pending appeal is denied as moot [ # 5598318-2 ]. Mandate shall issue forthwith. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and DUANE BENTON Adp Jan 2026 [5601542] [26-1085] (BNW) [Entered: 01/27/2026 02:45 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5601553] [26-1085] (BNW) [Entered: 01/27/2026 02:57 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, Duane Benton in St. Louis [5601532] [26-1085] (BNW) [Entered: 01/27/2026 02:32 PM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case, Motion to Expedite Review, filed by Attorney Kyle P. Hanson for Appellee United States of America w/service 01/16/2026. [5597981] [26-1085] (KPH) [Entered: 01/16/2026 09:56 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Garry A. Payton for Appellant Cortez Deandre Harris w/service 01/16/2026 [5598310] [26-1085] (GAP) [Entered: 01/16/2026 04:45 PM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION for stay pending appeal, filed by Attorney Garry A. Payton for Appellant Cortez Deandre Harris w/service 01/16/2026. [5598318] [26-1085]--[Edited to add the word "emergency" 01/20/2026 by AMT] (GAP) [Entered: 01/16/2026 05:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kyle P. Hanson for Appellee United States of America w/service 01/15/2026 [5597598] [26-1085] (KPH) [Entered: 01/15/2026 10:11 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5597278] [26-1085] (CBO) [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:31 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Order filed 12/31/2025, and Interlocutory Notice of Appeal filed 1/12/2026. [5597284] [26-1085] (CBO) [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:42 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 02/04/2026. Brief of appellant Cortez Deandre Harris due 02/18/2026. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5597286] [26-1085] (CBO) [Entered: 01/14/2026 12:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Cortez Harris | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Alan Stone |
| Represented By: | Kyle P. Hanson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cortez Deandre Harris | |
| Represented By: | Garry A. Payton |
| Represented By: | Cortez Deandre Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
