Baquan Sledge v. United States
| Baquan Sledge, also known as Rell, also known as TJ, also known as Matthew Pierce |
| United States of America |
| 26-1094 |
| January 15, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Baquan Sledge w/service 02/09/2026. [5606297] [26-1094] (MMH) [Entered: 02/09/2026 04:02 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report, Addendum, and Amended Statement of Reasons, Source Location: USDC / ND [5603373] [26-1094] (STL) [Entered: 02/02/2026 11:14 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - EXHIBITS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Government Exhibit #2 (DVD) - District Court document #1193 [Return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / ND [5603392] [26-1094] (STL) [Entered: 02/02/2026 11:25 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5597739] [26-1094] (MMH) [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:13 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of Order denying motion for habeas relief 10/8/25, Judgment 10/8/25, Order denying motion to amend 2255 petition 10/27/25, Order denying motion to reconsider 12/23/25, notice of appeal, and docket entries, [5597748] [26-1094] (MMH) [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:25 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/12/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5597750] [26-1094] (MMH) [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:26 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5597752] [26-1094] (MMH) [Entered: 01/15/2026 01:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Baquan Sledge v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Baquan Sledge, also known as Rell, also known as TJ, also known as Matthew Pierce | |
| Represented By: | Baquan Sledge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Rick Lee Volk |
| Represented By: | Megan A. Healy |
| Represented By: | Dawn M. Deitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.