United States v. Michael Teel
| United States of America |
| Michael Ray Teel |
| 26-1149 |
| January 26, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 5626716-2 ] filed by Michael Ray Teel 10 paper copies received, w/Addendum attached. [5632921] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/27/2026 10:30 AM] |
| 2nd PAPER brief deficiency sent to Chad R. Frese, for [ # 5626716-2 ], brief Appellant/Petitioner Brief [5630985] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/21/2026 09:18 AM] |
| PAPER brief deficiency sent to Chad R. Frese, for [ # 5626716-2 ], Appellant/Petitioner Brief. [5629551] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/16/2026 11:16 AM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Michael Ray Teel, w/service 04/08/2026. [5626717] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/08/2026 09:44 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - ANDERS BRIEF filed by Chad R. Frese for Michael Ray Teel, w/service 04/08/2026. Length: 5 pages. 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Michael Ray Teel due 04/13/2026 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. [5626716] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/08/2026 09:42 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellant's appointed attorney has moved for leave to withdraw and has tendered a brief in conformance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The Clerk is directed to file the Anders brief. Appellant is granted permission to file a pro se supplemental brief raising any additional issues he wishes the court to consider. The remainder of the briefing schedule is suspended pending review of the appellant's briefs pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988). Appointed counsel's motion to withdraw is held in abeyance pending the Penson review. Supplemental/letter brief due on 04/29/2026. [5626704] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/08/2026 09:37 AM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Michael Ray Teel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5626304] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 04/07/2026 11:22 AM] |
| 2nd Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel. [5624749] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/02/2026 09:05 AM] |
| JUDGE ORDER: Granting [ # 5623988-2 ] motion to file an amended brief filed by Chad R. Frese. Adp Mar 2026 [5624744] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 04/02/2026 08:57 AM] |
| MOTION to file an amended brief., filed by Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel w/service 03/31/2026. [5623988] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/31/2026 01:18 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Appellants second submitted brief varies substantively from the brief submitted on March 23, 2026. Appellant is directed to either file an opening brief that remedies the previously identified deficiencies only without substantive change or file a motion for leave to file an amended brief, no later than April 1, 2026. [5623593] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 03/30/2026 04:05 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Michael Ray Teel. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5623246] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 10:32 AM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Michael Ray Teel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5623242] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/30/2026 10:31 AM] |
| Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel. [5621895] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:38 AM] |
| Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel. New electronic copy of addendum due on 03/30/2026. [5621913] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 03/25/2026 11:56 AM] |
| MOTION to withdraw as appointed counsel, filed by Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel w/service 03/23/2026. [5621142] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:36 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Michael Ray Teel. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5621141] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:34 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Michael Ray Teel submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5621139] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/23/2026 04:33 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: Granting in Part [ # 5613812-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Chad R. Frese. [5613892] Brief of Michael Ray Teel due 03/23/2026. [5613892] [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 03/03/2026 08:41 AM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Michael Ray Teel regarding Notice of Change of Firm Name. w/service 03/02/2026 [5613815] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/02/2026 04:31 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 04/01/2026, filed by Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel w/service 03/02/2026. [5613812] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 03/02/2026 04:27 PM] |
| On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under Rule 27, certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance or certificate of service. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [5613547-2], submitted by Chad R. Frese in 26-1149, pending the filing of a certificate of compliance and certificate of service using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion. [26-1149] (HAG) [Entered: 03/02/2026 04:13 PM] |
| **LOCKED-COUNSEL REFILED MOTION WITH CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE & COMPLIANCE** MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 04/01/2026, filed by Attorney Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel w/service 03/02/2026.[5613547] [26-1149]--[Edited 03/02/2026 by HAG to correct relief and revise dkt txt]--[Edited 03/03/2026 by HAG to lock] (CRF) [Entered: 03/02/2026 01:12 PM] |
| **LOCKED-COUNSEL DIRECT TO REFILE USING CORRECT FILING EVENT** APPEARANCE filed by Chad Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel w/service 03/02/2026 [5613539] [26-1149]--[Edited 03/02/2026 by HAG] (CRF) [Entered: 03/02/2026 01:08 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed District Court documents #78-1 (Sealed PSI Report and Addendum), #80 (First Supplemental and Substituted Supervised Release Violation Worksheet and Recommendation), and #81 , Source Location: USDC / NICR [5609348] [26-1149] (STL) [Entered: 02/18/2026 01:16 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - HEARING TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: Revocation Hearing - District Court document #89 [Only Electronic Copy Received - No Paper Copy on File], Source Location: USDC / NICR, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 01/13/2026, No. of Pgs.: 26, Court Reporter: Murray, Patrice A. [5609339] [26-1149] (STL) [Entered: 02/18/2026 01:08 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of original CR Judgment 3/28/22, Probation Revocation Judgment 1/14/26, notice of appeal, and docket entries [5600881] [26-1149] (MMH) [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:05 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Chad R. Frese for Appellant Michael Ray Teel w/service 01/26/2026 [5601051] [26-1149] (CRF) [Entered: 01/26/2026 02:21 PM] |
| CRIMINAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: PSI report due 02/17/2026. Transcript due 02/17/2026. Brief of appellant Michael Ray Teel due 03/02/2026. Appellee(s) brief is due 21 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant(s) brief. Appellant reply brief is due 7 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellee's brief. [5600908] [26-1149] (MMH) [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:31 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Appointing Chad R. Frese for Michael Ray Teel under the Criminal Justice Act. [5600903] [26-1149] (MMH) [Entered: 01/26/2026 11:27 AM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5600871] [26-1149] (MMH) [Entered: 01/26/2026 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Michael Teel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Lisa C. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Ray Teel | |
| Represented By: | Michael Ray Teel |
| Represented By: | Chad R. Frese |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
