Michael Robertson v. Adam Clark, et al
Plaintiff: Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant: Adam Clark, Deputy Warden, Pine Bluff Unit and Jamesha Madden, Major, Pine Bluff Unit
Case Number: 26-1202
Filed: February 4, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2026 JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [ # 5613641-2 ] is denied. This appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee or demonstrate eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). DISMISSED BOBBY E. SHEPHERD, RALPH R. ERICKSON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Mar 2026 [5622472] [26-1202] (NDG) [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:04 PM]
March 24, 2026 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Bobby E. Shepherd, Ralph R. Erickson, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5622470] [26-1202] (NDG) [Entered: 03/26/2026 02:01 PM]
March 2, 2026 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Michael Otis Robertson, w/service 03/02/2026. [5613641] [26-1202] (CJO) [Entered: 03/02/2026 02:16 PM]
February 17, 2026 Supporting Documents filed by Appellant Michael Otis Robertson, in support of originating court document notice of appeal Doc No. [ # 5604478-2 ], w/service 02/17/2026. [5608747] [26-1202] (CJO) [Entered: 02/17/2026 01:03 PM]
February 4, 2026 Prisoner case docketed. [5604473] [26-1202] (CJO) [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:19 AM]
February 4, 2026 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Recommended Disposition 08/06/2025, Order 01/14/2026, and Judgment 01/14/2026. [5604478] [26-1202] (CJO) [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:23 AM]
February 4, 2026 CLERK ORDER:This court has previously determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to either 1) pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $605, or 2) to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) to proceed without pre-payment of the fee, and to submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order with the required pleading and motion within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 03/06/2026. [5604483] [26-1202] (CJO) [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:27 AM]
February 4, 2026 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5604485] [26-1202] (CJO) [Entered: 02/04/2026 10:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Michael Robertson v. Adam Clark, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Otis Robertson
Represented By: Michael Otis Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Clark, Deputy Warden, Pine Bluff Unit
Represented By: Zaisha Heardmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jamesha Madden, Major, Pine Bluff Unit
Represented By: Zaisha Heardmon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?