David Palmer, II v. Anoka County, et al
| David Edward Palmer, II, Sui Juris, Jus Personaum |
| Anoka County, Municipality, Quinn Massey, Anoka County Court Actors and Fridley Police Officers in their official and individual private capacity, Patrick Faber, Anoka County Court Actors and Fridley Police Officers in their official and individual private capacity, Alexander Wegner, Anoka County Court Actors and Fridley Police Officers in their official and individual private capacity, Nicholas Steiger, Anoka County Court Actors and Fridley Police Officers in their official and individual private capacity, Kurtis Tirevold, Anoka County Court Actors and Fridley Police Officers in their official and individual private capacity, Tyler Abrahamson, Anoka County Court Actors and Fridley Police Officers in their official and individual private capacity, Antonia Lord, Anoka County Public Defender - sued in their official and private/individual capacity, Suzanne Brown, Anoka County Judge - sued in their official and private/individual capacity, Gretchen Zettler, Prosecutors - sued in their official and private/individual capacity, Blair Buccicone, Prosecutors - sued in their official and private/individual capacity, Unknown, (Reed-Hall) Prosecutors - sued in their official and private/individual capacity, Brad Wise, Anoka County Jail, P. Gault, Anoka County Correctional Officer, S. Fischer, Nurse Staff, Andrew Todd, Kevin Titus, Nicholas Knaeble, Chris McClish, Zak Chlebeck, Travis Volk, Erik Johnson, David Kostuch, Shawn Murphy, Laura Schroeder, Thomas Lueck, Mark Mickelson, Nico Wallat, Steve Munsrud, Michael Antigua, Brian T. Weierke and Michael Smith |
| 26-1309 |
| February 23, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of David Edward Palmer II due 04/13/2026 [5623138] [26-1309] (CBO) [Entered: 03/30/2026 08:50 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5610630] [26-1309] (CBO) [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:33 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Report and Recommendation filed 7/30/2025, Opinion and Order Accepting R&R in part filed 9/2/2025, Judgment filed 9/4/2025, Notice of Appeal filed 11/6/2025, and Order filed 12/30/2025. [5610639] [26-1309] (CBO) [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:39 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 03/23/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5610643] [26-1309] (CBO) [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:42 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5610653] [26-1309] (CBO) [Entered: 02/23/2026 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.