Trezon Griffin v. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, et al
| Trezon Griffin |
| Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Tim Griffin, Tim Ryals, Shanita Gunn, Toya Johnson, Q. Bieler, Sgt., Gary Mussellwhite, Pierce, Deputy, L. Young, Richardson, Deputy, James, Cpt., Kitchen Staff, Cummins, Rolonda R. Scruggs, Minor Justice, Kristine G. Baker, Judge, Ashley King, Inmate Grievance Coordinator, H. Lee, Mail Room Supervisor, Cummins and Does, Doc. Asst. Maintenance Supervisors; Law Library Supervisor; Doc. Unit Trainer; Head of Chaplain Services; Residential Operations Manager; Advisor; Staff Development Specialist; Military Housing Manager; Rehabilitation Instructor |
| 26-1389 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5666313] [26-1389] (GP) [Entered: 07/29/2026 10:59 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Denying [ # 5654140-2 ] motion to amend complaint filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin. Denying [ # 5663394-2 ] motion to dismiss case. Mandate shall issue forthwith. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp July 2026 [5666304] [26-1389] (GP) [Entered: 07/29/2026 10:51 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5666257] [26-1389] (GP) [Entered: 07/29/2026 10:16 AM] |
| MOTION to dismiss case filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin w/service 07/21/2026 by USCA8. [5663394] [26-1389] (GP) [Entered: 07/21/2026 03:10 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding the status of the appeal. [5661180] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:11 AM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Trezon Griffin inquiring as to the status of the case w/service 07/10/2026 [5661174] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 07/15/2026 10:05 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-1389: due] [5658875] [26-1389] (GP) [Entered: 07/08/2026 02:05 PM] |
| JUDGE ORDER:Denying [ # 5626806-2 ] [ # 5651305-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin. Adp July 2026 [5658872] [26-1389] (GP) [Entered: 07/08/2026 01:56 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:motion to amend complaint filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin in 26-1389 [ # 5654140-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5654161] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:28 AM] |
| MOTION motion to amend complaint filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin w/service 06/15/2026. [5654140] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:10 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - TRO order and memorandum in support of TRO filed by Trezon Griffin w/service 06/15/2026 [5654151] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 06/24/2026 11:20 AM] |
| SECOND MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin w/service 06/15/2026. [5651305] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 06/15/2026 04:20 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - status update/intention to amend complaint filed by Trezon Griffin. w/service 06/15/2026 [5651303] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 06/15/2026 04:17 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding brief amiceus/order forwarded to district court. [5626828] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2026 11:25 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - habeas corpus cum causa/certiorari filed by Trezon Griffin. w/service 04/07/2026 [5626852] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2026 11:52 AM] |
| Tendered brief amiceus/order received from Appellant Trezon Griffin w/service 04/07/2026 [5626825] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2026 11:24 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Trezon Griffin w/service 04/07/2026. [5626806] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 04/08/2026 11:08 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Trezon Griffin due 04/21/2026 [5626221] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Recommendation dated 12/17/2025, Order dated 1/6/2026, Judgment dated 1/6/2026 [5615037] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 03/05/2026 09:33 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/02/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5615383] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 03/05/2026 04:21 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 03/05/2026 denying leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, [5615382] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 03/05/2026 04:20 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5615039] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 03/05/2026 09:34 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5615033] [26-1389] (RDB) [Entered: 03/05/2026 09:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.