State of Missouri, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
| State of Missouri, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio and State of Oklahoma |
| Donald Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, Linda S. McMahon, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education |
| 26-1394 |
| March 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - The District Courts order of dismissal is reversed and the District Court is directed to enter the final judgment, as jointly requested by the parties. The emergency motion is denied as moot. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [ # 5615320-2 ] RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, RALPH R. ERICKSON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Mar 2026 [5616315] [26-1394] (AMT) [Entered: 03/09/2026 03:03 PM] |
| 28(j) citation filed by Appellants State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Missouri, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio and State of Oklahoma w/service 03/09/2026 - FOR CAL [5616220] [26-1394] (LJC) [Entered: 03/09/2026 01:28 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5616330] [26-1394] (AMT) [Entered: 03/09/2026 03:09 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5615301] [26-1394] (CMH) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:46 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order 02/27/2026, Order of Dismissal 02/27/2026, and Order 03/04/2026. [5615309] [26-1394] (CMH) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:50 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 04/14/2026. Appendix due 04/24/2026. BRIEF APPELLANT, State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Missouri, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio and State of Oklahoma due 04/24/2026 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5615311] [26-1394] (CMH) [Entered: 03/05/2026 02:51 PM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION for stay of district court dismissal order pending appeal, filed by Attorney Louis Joseph Capozzi, III for Appellants State of Missouri, State of Oklahoma, State of Arkansas, State of Georgia, State of North Dakota, State of Florida and State of Ohio, w/service 03/05/2026. [5615320] [26-1394]--[Edited 03/05/2026 by CMH to modify text] (CMH) [Entered: 03/05/2026 03:01 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Addendum to Emergency Motion for Stay filed by State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Missouri, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio and State of Oklahoma, w/service 03/05/2026. [5615322] [26-1394] (CMH) [Entered: 03/05/2026 03:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Sarah N. Smith for Appellees United States Department of Education, Linda S. McMahon and Donald Trump w/service 03/05/2026 [5615343] [26-1394]--[Edited 03/05/2026 by BNW to correct name of appellee.] (SNS) [Entered: 03/05/2026 03:28 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Louis J. Capozzi, III for Appellants State of Arkansas, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Missouri, State of North Dakota, State of Ohio and State of Oklahoma w/service 03/05/2026 [5615375] [26-1394] (LJC) [Entered: 03/05/2026 04:05 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Simon Gregory Jerome for Appellees EDUC, Linda S. McMahon and Donald Trump w/service 03/05/2026 [5615419] [26-1394] (SGJ) [Entered: 03/05/2026 07:51 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Ralph R. Erickson, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5616260] [26-1394] (AMT) [Entered: 03/09/2026 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
