Joshua Thompson v. Clay County Sheriffs, et al
Plaintiff: Joshua Thompson
Defendant: Clay County, Sheriffs, Michael A. Rapp, of MN DOC, Clay County Jail, Staff and Clay County, Correctional Facility
Case Number: 26-1414
Filed: March 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2026 MEMORANDUM in support of petition for rehearing by panel, filed by Joshua Thompson in 26-1414 , Doc No. [ # 5631623-2 ]. w/service 04/28/2026 by USCA8. Also, mailing a copy of docket sheet to appellant per his request within the memorandum. [5633628] [26-1414] (JES) [Entered: 04/28/2026 02:38 PM]
April 20, 2026 PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Joshua Thompson w/service 04/22/2026 by UCSA8. [5631623] [26-1414] (JES) [Entered: 04/22/2026 11:49 AM]
April 8, 2026 JUDGE ORDER: Granting [ # 5626220-2 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing filed by Appellant Joshua Thompson. Petition for rehearing due on 04/22/2026. Adp Mar 2026 [5627015] [26-1414] (JES) [Entered: 04/08/2026 03:29 PM]
April 1, 2026 MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing, filed by Appellant Joshua Thompson w/service 04/07/2026 by USCA8. [5626220] [26-1414] (JES) [Entered: 04/07/2026 10:00 AM]
March 16, 2026 JUDGMENT FILED - Case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Mar 2026 [5618641] [26-1414] (JES) [Entered: 03/16/2026 08:24 AM]
March 10, 2026 Prisoner case docketed. [5616545] [26-1414] (ASL) [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:22 AM]
March 10, 2026 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 2/2/2026, supplemental notice of appeal 2/10/2026, R & R filed 10/9/2025, Order filed 12/23/2025, Judgment filed 12/23/2025, Order on IFP filed 3/6/2026, and docket entries, [5616565] [26-1414] (ASL) [Entered: 03/10/2026 09:47 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joshua Thompson v. Clay County Sheriffs, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Thompson
Represented By: Joshua Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clay County, Sheriffs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael A. Rapp, of MN DOC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clay County Jail, Staff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clay County, Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?