United States v. Bryce LaNear
| United States of America |
| Bryce LaNear |
| 26-1421 |
| March 10, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Bryce LaNear, w/service 04/28/2026. [5633328] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 04/28/2026 08:56 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 04/21/2026, Order Denying motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. [5631145] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 04/21/2026 12:58 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/19/2026, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5631153] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:04 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-1421: due] [5631157] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 04/21/2026 01:06 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Bryce LaNear. w/service 04/06/2026 , Length: 5 pages , The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. , [5625915] [26-1421] (JES) [Entered: 04/06/2026 01:52 PM] |
| CRIMINAL case docketed. [5616803] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:30 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment 03/11/2025, and Order 02/18/2026.[5616813] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:36 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5616826] [26-1421] (CJO) [Entered: 03/10/2026 02:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States v. Bryce LaNear | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Randall D. Eggert |
| Represented By: | Cameron Beaver |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bryce LaNear | |
| Represented By: | Bryce LaNear |
| Represented By: | Jason Coatney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.