Joe Edger v. United States
| Joe Edger |
| United States of America |
| 26-1422 |
| March 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5646785] [26-1422] (JES) [Entered: 06/02/2026 01:15 PM] |
| REPLY to the United States' Response in opposition to the motion for successive habeas petition [ # 5622131-2 ] filed by Petitioner Joe Edger w/service 05/01/2026 by USCA8. [5635534] [26-1422] (JES) [Entered: 05/01/2026 02:40 PM] |
| ****DOCUMENT LOCKED**** PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Petitioner Joe Edger w/service 04/22/2026 by USCA8. [5631478] [26-1422] --[Edited 05/01/2026 by JES] THIS DOCUMENT WAS FILED IN ERROR AND WILL BE REFILED UNDER THE CORRECT EVENT. (JES) [Entered: 04/22/2026 09:49 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Denying [ # 5617045-2 ] motion for successive habeas petition filed by Petitioner Joe Edger.; Denying as moot the motion to produce case files [ # 5617065-2 ], and the motion to unseal district court document No. 231 [ # 5617064-2 ]. DENIED. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, BOBBY E. SHEPHERD and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Apr 2026 [5626964] [26-1422] (JES) [Entered: 04/08/2026 02:37 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Bobby E. Shepherd, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5626951] [26-1422] (JES) [Entered: 04/08/2026 02:28 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion for successive habeas petition [ # 5617045-2 ] filed by Attorney Jonathan A. Clow for Respondent United States of America , w/service 03/25/2026. [5622131] [26-1422] (JAC) [Entered: 03/25/2026 04:09 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jonathan A. Clow for Respondent United States of America w/service 03/25/2026 [5622102] [26-1422] (JAC) [Entered: 03/25/2026 03:46 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5617034] [26-1422] (CMH) [Entered: 03/11/2026 08:44 AM] |
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Joe Edger w/service 03/11/2026. Response of Respondent United States of America due 03/25/2026. [5617045] [26-1422] (CMH) [Entered: 03/11/2026 08:48 AM] |
| MEMORANDUM in support of motion for successive habeas petition, filed by Joe Edger, Doc No. [ # 5617045-2 ], w/service 03/11/2026. [5617058] [26-1422] (CMH) [Entered: 03/11/2026 08:57 AM] |
| MOTION to unseal district court document no. 231, filed by Petitioner Joe Edger, w/service 03/11/2026. [5617064] [26-1422] (CMH) [Entered: 03/11/2026 09:02 AM] |
| MOTION to produce case files, filed by Petitioner Joe Edger, w/service 03/11/2026. [5617065] [26-1422] (CMH) [Entered: 03/11/2026 09:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joe Edger v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Joe Edger | |
| Represented By: | Joe Edger |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Christian Albus |
| Represented By: | Jonathan A. Clow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
