Jason Lynch v. White County Jail, et al
| Jason Matthew Lynch |
| White County Jail, White County Detention Center, Edwards, Captain, White County Detention Center, Does, John Does 110, Jane Does 110, Correctional Officers, Supervisors, Administrative Staff, White County Detention Center ; Sheriff, White County and White County, Arkansas |
| 26-1444 |
| March 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-1444: In Forma Pauperis] [5634594] [26-1444] (NDG) [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:46 AM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - : The appellants Motion to Strike Appeal and to Vacate Filing Fee Assessment [ # 5624371-2 ] is granted. The appeal is dismissed as moot and the March 12, 2026, order requiring the assessment of a filing fee [5617856-2] is vacated. The district court shall cease collecting the filing fee for this appeal. This court's mandate shall issue forthwith. DISMISSED JAMES B. LOKEN, LAVENSKI R. SMITH and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Mar 2026 [5627703] [26-1444] (NDG) [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:01 AM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5627708] [26-1444] (NDG) [Entered: 04/10/2026 10:06 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 03/31/2026: Text Order denying #48 & #50 motions to reassign case and to strike appeal, [5624369] [26-1444] (HAG) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:25 AM] |
| MOTION to strike appeal and vacate filing fee assessment, filed by Appellant Jason Matthew Lynch w/service by USCA8 04/01/2026. [5624371] [26-1444] (HAG) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:26 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Pro se filings from appellant Jason Matthew Lynch. **No action taken. Documents were directed to and filed with the district court on 03/20/2026 & 03/30/2026.** (1) Dkt. 42 - Motion Requesting Clerk Review and Docket Verification of Prior Filings; (2) Dkt. 43 - Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Reconsideration of IFP Denial; (3) Dkt. 44 - Motion for Reconsideration and Notice of Compliance with IFP Orders; (4) Dkt. 46 - Motion for Judicial Notice of Prior IFP Filings; (5) Dkt. 48 - Notice of Patern of Error, Denial of District Judge Review, and Request for Reassignment or Transfer; (6) Dkt. 49 - Objections to Order, Motion to Strike, and Request for District Judge Review; (7) Dkt. 51 - Objections, Motion for District Judge Review, Motion to Strike and Set Aside Dkt Entry 40, and Motion for Recusal of Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe; (8) Dkt. 52 - Motion to Reassign/Transfer Case to same Judicial Officers as Related Actions; (9) Dkt. 53 - Response and Partial Objections to Order; and (10) Dkt. 54 - Emergency Motion to Stay Collection of Appeallate Filing Fee. [5624379] [26-1444] (HAG) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:44 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Lavenski R. Smith, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5627654] [26-1444] (NDG) [Entered: 04/10/2026 08:58 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 03/16/2026 granting in forma pauperis and calculation of appellate filing fees. [5620548] [26-1444] (CMH) [Entered: 03/20/2026 11:00 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 26-1444: plra] [5620549] [26-1444] (CMH) [Entered: 03/20/2026 11:01 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5617850] [26-1444] (CMH) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:43 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 02/19/2026, Order 03/04/2026, and Docket Text Order 03/12/2026. [5617853] [26-1444] (CMH) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:56 PM] |
| ***VACATED***CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of determining the appellant's IFP status and assessment of the docketing fees pursuant to 28 USC Section 1915 as amended by PLRA. [5617856] [26-1444]--[Edited 04/30/2026 by NDG] This document is locked as it has been vacated pursuant to this court's judgment of April 10, 2026. See document ID 5627703. (CMH) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:57 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5617857] [26-1444] (CMH) [Entered: 03/12/2026 02:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
